Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid and strontium-89 as bone protecting treatments in addition to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castrate-refractory prostate cancer : results from the TRAPEZE trial (ISRCTN 12808747)

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Andronis, L. (Lazaros) , Goranitis, I., Pirrie, S., Pope, A., Barton, D., Collins, S., Daunton, A., McLaren, D., O'Sullivan, J. M., Parker, C. et al.
(2017) Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid and strontium-89 as bone protecting treatments in addition to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castrate-refractory prostate cancer : results from the TRAPEZE trial (ISRCTN 12808747). BJU International, 119 (4). pp. 522-529. doi:10.1111/bju.13549

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13549

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective
To evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of adding zoledronic acid or strontium‐89 to standard docetaxel chemotherapy for patients with castrate‐refractory prostate cancer (CRPC).

Patients and methods
Data on resource use and quality of life for 707 patients collected prospectively in the TRAPEZE 2 × 2 factorial randomised trial (ISRCTN 12808747) were used to assess the cost‐effectiveness of i) zoledronic acid versus no zoledronic acid (ZA vs. no ZA), and ii) strontium‐89 versus no strontium‐89 (Sr89 vs. no Sr89). Costs were estimated from the perspective of the National Health Service in the UK and included expenditures for trial treatments, concomitant medications, and use of related hospital and primary care services. Quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) were calculated according to patients' responses to the generic EuroQol EQ‐5D‐3L instrument, which evaluates health status. Results are expressed as incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves.

Results
The per‐patient cost for ZA was £12 667, £251 higher than the equivalent cost in the no ZA group. Patients in the ZA group had on average 0.03 QALYs more than their counterparts in no ZA group. The ICER for this comparison was £8 005. Sr89 was associated with a cost of £13 230, £1365 higher than no Sr89, and a gain of 0.08 QALYs compared to no Sr89. The ICER for Sr89 was £16 884. The probabilities of ZA and Sr89 being cost‐effective were 0.64 and 0.60, respectively.

Conclusions
The addition of bone‐targeting treatments to standard chemotherapy led to a small improvement in QALYs for a modest increase in cost (or cost‐savings). ZA and Sr89 resulted in ICERs below conventional willingness‐to‐pay per QALY thresholds, suggesting that their addition to chemotherapy may represent a cost‐effective use of resources.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: BJU International
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1464-1603
Official Date: April 2017
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2017Published
3 June 2016Available
UNSPECIFIEDAccepted
Volume: 119
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 522-529
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13549
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us