Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Association between use of systematic reviews and national policy recommendations on screening newborn babies for rare diseases : systematic review and meta-analysis

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Stinton, Chris, Ferrante di Ruffano, Lavinia, Seedat, Farah, Clarke, Aileen and Deeks, Jonathan J. (2018) Association between use of systematic reviews and national policy recommendations on screening newborn babies for rare diseases : systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 361 . k1612. doi:10.1136/bmj.k1612

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-association-between-use-systematic-reviews-national-policy-recommendations-Taylor-Phillips-2018.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (813Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP-association-systematic-policy-screening-babies-diseases-Stinton-2018.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (565Kb)
Official URL: http://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k1612

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective

To understand whether international differences in recommendations of whether to screen for rare diseases using the newborn blood spot test might in part be explained by use of systematic review methods.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

Website searches of 26 national screening organisations.

Eligibility criteria for study selection

Journal articles, papers, legal documents, presentations, conference abstracts, or reports relating to a national recommendation on whether to screen for any condition using the newborn blood spot test, with no restrictions on date or language.

Data extraction

Two reviewers independently assessed whether the recommendation for or against screening included systematic reviews, and data on test accuracy, benefits of early detection, and potential harms of overdiagnosis.

Analysis

The odds of recommending screening according to the use of systematic review methods was estimated across conditions using meta-analysis.

Results

93 reports were included that assessed 104 conditions across 14 countries, totalling 276 recommendations (units of analysis). Screening was favoured in 159 (58%) recommendations, not favoured in 98 (36%), and not recommended either way in 19 (7%). Only 60 (22%) of the recommendations included a systematic review. Use of a systematic review was associated with a reduced probability of screening being recommended (23/60 (38%) v 136/216 (63%), odds ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.43). Of the recommendations, evidence for test accuracy, benefits of early detection, and overdiagnosis was not considered in 115 (42%), 83 (30%), and 211 (76%), respectively.

Conclusions

Using systematic review methods is associated with a reduced probability of screening being recommended. Many national policy reviews of screening for rare conditions using the newborn blood spot test do not assess the evidence on the key benefits and harms of screening.

Item Type: Journal Article
Alternative Title:
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Population, Evidence & Technologies (PET)
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Blood -- Analysis, Infants -- Diseases -- Diagnosis, Medical screening, Systematic reviews (Medical research)
Journal or Publication Title: British Medical Journal
Publisher: BMJ Group
ISSN: 0959-8146
Official Date: 9 May 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
9 May 2018Published
16 March 2018Accepted
Volume: 361
Article Number: k1612
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1612
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us