Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Reviewing the literature : adopting a systematic approach

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bruce, J. (Julie) and Mollison, Jill (2004) Reviewing the literature : adopting a systematic approach. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 30 (1). pp. 13-16. doi:10.1783/147118904322701901

An open access version can be found in:
  • Publisher
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1783/147118904322701901

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Although this Journal regularly accepts narrative rather than systematic reviews, the aim of this short paper is to encourage practitioners and researchers in family planning and reproductive health care to adopt a thorough and objective approach to literature reviews. It is hoped that readers appreciate what constitutes a systematic literature review and their application in identifying current knowledge in family planning to facilitate practice. The systematic review overcomes much of the subjectivity of traditional narrative reviews by using an objective approach to reduce bias. The key stages in conducting a review outlined above should be considered, namely: comprehensive identification of relevant literature, explicit inclusion criteria, critical assessment of included studies, summarising data in an informative manner and interpretation of findings. It is recommended that reviews be as systematic as is practical but there is often a trade-off to be considered between time and cost of conducting a review against resulting quality. Busy practitioners may not have the time or resources to conduct systematic reviews to the standards recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration or the NHS CRD. In practice, reviews span from subjective essays based upon personal opinion to 'Cochrane-style' systematic reviews. Nevertheless, we hope this paper emphasises the need for methodological rigour when literature reviewing and encourages practitioners to move along the continuum away from personal opinion towards objective, systematic reviews.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
Publisher: BMJ
ISSN: 1471-1893
Official Date: January 2004
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2004Published
29 October 2003Accepted
Volume: 30
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 13-16
DOI: 10.1783/147118904322701901
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Open Access Version:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us