Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator : agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Wilson, A. P. R., Gibbons, C., Reeves, B. C., Hodgson, B., Liu, M., Plummet, D., Krukowski, Z. H., Bruce, J. (Julie), Wilson, J. and Pearson, A. (2004) Surgical wound infection as a performance indicator : agreement of common definitions of wound infection in 4773 patients. British Medical Journal, 329 (7468). pp. 720-723. doi:10.1136/bmj.38232.646227.DE

An open access version can be found in:
  • Publisher
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38232.646227.DE

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective To assess the level of agreement between common definitions of wound infection that might be used as performance indicators.

Design Prospective observational study.

Setting London teaching hospital group receiving emergency cases as well as tertiary referrals.

Participants 4773 surgical patients staying in hospital at least two nights.

Main outcome measures Numbers of wound infections based on purulent discharge alone, on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definition of wound infection, on the nosocomial infection national surveillance scheme (NINSS) version of the CDC definition, and on the ASEPSIS scoring method.

Results 5804 surgical wounds were assessed during 5028 separate hospital admissions. The mean percentage of wounds classified as infected differed substantially with different definitions: 19.2% with the CDC definition (95% confidence interval 18.1% to 20.4%), 14.6% (13.6% to 15.6%) with the NINSS version, 12.3% (11.4% to 13.2%) with pus alone, and 6.8% (6.1% to 7.5%) with an ASEPSIS score > 20. The agreement between definitions with respect to individual wounds was poor. Wounds with pus were automatically defined as infected with the CDC, NINSS, and pus alone definitions, but only 39% (283/714) of these had ASEPSIS scores > 20.

Conclusions Small changes made to the CDC definition or even in its interpretation, as with the NINSS version, caused major variation in estimated percentage of wound infection. Substantial numbers of wounds were differently classified across the grades of infection. A single definition used consistently can show changes in percentage wound infection over time at a single centre, but differences in interpretation prevent comparison between different centres.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: British Medical Journal
Publisher: BMJ
ISSN: 0959-8146
Official Date: 23 September 2004
Dates:
DateEvent
23 September 2004Published
4 August 2004Accepted
Volume: 329
Number: 7468
Page Range: pp. 720-723
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38232.646227.DE
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Open Access Version:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us