The Library
Theorizing from qualitative research in public administration : plurality through a combination of rigor and richness
Tools
Tools
Tools
Ashworth, Rachel, McDermott, Aoife and Currie, Graeme (2019) Theorizing from qualitative research in public administration : plurality through a combination of rigor and richness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29 (2). pp. 318-333. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy057
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-theorizing-qualitative-public-rigor-richness-Currie-2018.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 11 October 2020. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1828Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057
Abstract
Scholars emphasize the need for additional rigor in qualitative research. This inadvertently encourages formulaic and standardized approaches that undermine the benefits of theorizing from rich data. Our study extends debate by emphasizing the importance of sound qualitative public administration research that blends rigor with richness and thereby facilitates effective theorization. Evidence from a narrative review of 31 qualitative studies published within six leading public administration journals demonstrates that effective theorizing is linked to transparency in research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution. In-depth interrogation of four studies that illustrate “inductive theorizing” and “abductive theorizing” identifies plurality in the balance struck between rigor and richness. We derive a broad set of principles that enable researchers to make a convincing “conceptual leap” between data, analysis, and contribution. We also emphasize the need to accommodate pluralistic approaches to theorizing by nuancing requirements for essential aspects of qualitative reporting, versus those amenable to variation.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 1053-1858 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | April 2019 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 20 July 2018 | ||||||||
| Volume: | 29 | ||||||||
| Number: | 2 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 318-333 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1093/jopart/muy057 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Publisher Statement: | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory following peer review. The version of record Rachel Elizabeth Ashworth, Aoife Mary McDermott, Graeme Currie; Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, , muy057, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057 is available online at:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057 | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | ||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
