The Library
2015 revised Utstein-style recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data rrom drowning-related resuscitation : an ILCOR advisory statement
Tools
(2017) 2015 revised Utstein-style recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data rrom drowning-related resuscitation : an ILCOR advisory statement. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 10 (7). e000024. doi:10.1161/hcq.0000000000000024 ISSN 1941-7705.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/hcq.0000000000000024
Abstract
Background-Utstein-style guidelines use an established consensus process, endorsed by the international resuscitation community, to facilitate and structure resuscitation research and publication. The first "Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Data From Drowning" were published over a decade ago. During the intervening years, resuscitation science has advanced considerably, thus making revision of the guidelines timely. In particular, measurement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation elements and neurological outcomes reporting have advanced substantially. The purpose of this report is to provide updated guidelines for reporting data from studies of resuscitation from drowning.& para;& para;Methods-An international group with scientific expertise in the fields of drowning research, resuscitation research, emergency medical services, public health, and development of guidelines met in Potsdam, Germany, to determine the data that should be reported in scientific articles on the subject of resuscitation from drowning. At the Utstein-style meeting, participants discussed data elements in detail, defined the data, determined data priority, and decided how data should be reported, including scoring methods and category details.& para;& para;Results-The template for reporting data from drowning research was revised extensively, with new emphasis on measurement of quality of resuscitation, neurological outcomes, and deletion of data that have proved to be less relevant or difficult to capture.& para;& para;Conclusions-The report describes the consensus process, rationale for selecting data elements to be reported, definitions and priority of data, and scoring methods. These guidelines are intended to improve the clarity of scientific communication and the comparability of scientific investigations.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) | ||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Trials Unit Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences |
||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes | ||||||
Publisher: | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | ||||||
ISSN: | 1941-7705 | ||||||
Official Date: | July 2017 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Volume: | 10 | ||||||
Number: | 7 | ||||||
Article Number: | e000024 | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1161/hcq.0000000000000024 | ||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |