The Library

Why do doctored images distort memory?

Tools

Nash, Robert Alastair, Wade, Kimberley A. and Brewer, Rebecca J.. (2009) Why do doctored images distort memory? Consciousness and Cognition, Vol.18 (No.3). pp. 773-780. ISSN 1053-8100

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Wade_nash-wade-brewer-inpress.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (783Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.011

Abstract

Doctored images can cause people to believe in and remember experiences that never occurred, yet the underlying mechanism(s) responsible are not well understood. How does compelling false evidence distort autobiographical memory? Subjects were filmed observing and copying a Research Assistant performing simple actions, then they returned 2 days later for a memory test. Before taking the test, subjects viewed video-clips of simple actions, including actions that they neither observed nor performed earlier. We varied the format of the video-clips between-subjects to tap into the source-monitoring mechanisms responsible for the ‘doctored-evidence effect.’ The distribution of belief and memory distortions across conditions suggests that at least two mechanisms are involved: doctored images create an illusion of familiarity, and also enhance the perceived credibility of false suggestions. These findings offer insight into how external evidence influences source-monitoring.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Psychology

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

False memory syndrome, Autobiographical memory, Imagery (Psychology), Metacognition

Journal or Publication Title:

Consciousness and Cognition

Publisher:

Elsevier

ISSN:

1053-8100

Official Date:

September 2009

Dates:

Date	Event
September 2009	Published

Volume:

Vol.18

Number:

No.3

Page Range:

pp. 773-780

Identification Number:

10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.011

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

References:

Bernstein et al., 2002 D.M. Bernstein, B.W.A. Whittlesea and E.F. Loftus, Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect, Memory & Cognition 30 (2002), pp. 432–438.

Dror and Charlton, 2006 I.E. Dror and D. Charlton, Why experts make errors, Journal of Forensic Identification 56 (2006), pp. 600–616.

Echterhoff et al., 2005 G. Echterhoff, W. Hirst and W. Hussy, How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics, Memory & Cognition 33 (2005), pp. 770–782.

Garry and Gerrie, 2005 M. Garry and M.P. Gerrie, When photographs create false memories, Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (2005), pp. 321–325.

Gohara, 2006 M.S. Gohara, A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques, Fordham Urban Law Journal 33 (2006), pp. 791–842.

Henkel and Carbuto, 2008 L.A. Henkel and M. Carbuto, Remembering what we did: How source misattributions arise from verbalization, mental imagery, and pictures. In: M. Kelley, Editor, Applied memory, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY (2008), pp. 213–234.

Jacoby et al., 1989 L.L. Jacoby, C.M. Kelley and J. Dywan, Memory attributions. In: H.L. Roediger III and F.I.M. Craik, Editors, Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1989), pp. 391–422.

Johnson et al., 1988 M.K. Johnson, M.A. Foley, A.G. Suengas and C.L. Raye, Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 (1988), pp. 371–376.

Johnson et al., 1993 M.K. Johnson, S. Hashtroudi and D.S. Lindsay, Source monitoring, Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993), pp. 3–28.

Kassin and Gudjonsson, 2004 S.M. Kassin and G.H. Gudjonsson, The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (2004), pp. 33–67.

Lindsay, 2008 Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source monitoring. In J. H. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 325–348). Oxford: Elsevier.

Lindsay et al., 2004 D.S. Lindsay, L. Hagen, J.D. Read, K.A. Wade and M. Garry, True photographs and false memories, Psychological Science 15 (2004), pp. 149–154.

Mazzoni and Kirsch, 2002 G. Mazzoni and I. Kirsch, Autobiographical memories and beliefs: A preliminary metacognitive model. In: T.J. Perfect and B.L. Schwartz, Editors, Applied metacognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2002), pp. 121–146.

Moore, 2009 Moore, S. (2009). Science found wanting in nation’s crime labs. New York Times. <www.nytimes.com>. Retrieved 5.2.2009.

Nash and Wade, 2009 R.A. Nash and K.A. Wade, Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence, Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009), pp. 624–637.

Nash et al., 2009 R.A. Nash, K.A. Wade and D.S. Lindsay, Digitally manipulating memory: Effects of doctored videos and imagination in distorting beliefs and memories, Memory & Cognition 37 (2009), pp. 414–424.

Scoboria et al., 2004 A. Scoboria, G. Mazzoni, I. Kirsch and M. Relyea, Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory, Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (2004), pp. 791–807.

Smeets et al., 2005 T. Smeets, H. Merckelbach, R. Horselenberg and M. Jelicic, Trying to recollect past events: Confidence, beliefs, and memories, Clinical Psychology Review 25 (2005), pp. 917–934.

Tversky and Kahneman, 1973 A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology 5 (1973), pp. 207–232.

Vornik et al., 2003 L.A. Vornik, S.J. Sharman and M. Garry, The power of the spoken word: Sociolinguistic cues influence the misinformation effect, Memory 11 (2003), pp. 101–109.

Wade and Garry, 2005 K.A. Wade and M. Garry, Strategies for verifying false autobiographical memories, American Journal of Psychology 118 (2005), pp. 587–602.

Wade et al., 2002 K.A. Wade, M. Garry, J.D. Read and D.S. Lindsay, A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002), pp. 597–603.

Winkielman et al., 2003 P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz, R. Reber and T.A. Fazendeiro, Cognitive and affective consequences of visual fluency: When seeing is easy on the mind. In: L.M. Scott and R. Batra, Editors, Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2003), pp. 75–90.

Wynne-Jones, 2008 Wynne-Jones, J. (2008, March 1). Web social networkers doctor photographs. <www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1580372/web-social-networkers-doctor-photographs.html>. Retrieved 10.2.2009.

Young, 2008 Young, J. R. (2008, May 29). Journals find fakery in many images submitted to support research. Chronicle of Higher Education. <www.chronicle.com/free/2008/05/3028n.htm>. Retrieved 10.2.2009.

URI:

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1061

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record