Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Why do doctored images distort memory?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nash, Robert Alastair, Wade, Kimberley A. and Brewer, Rebecca J.. (2009) Why do doctored images distort memory? Consciousness and Cognition, Vol.18 (No.3). pp. 773-780. ISSN 1053-8100

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Wade_nash-wade-brewer-inpress.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (783Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.011

Abstract

Doctored images can cause people to believe in and remember experiences that never occurred, yet the underlying mechanism(s) responsible are not well understood. How does compelling false evidence distort autobiographical memory? Subjects were filmed observing and copying a Research Assistant performing simple actions, then they returned 2 days later for a memory test. Before taking the test, subjects viewed video-clips of simple actions, including actions that they neither observed nor performed earlier. We varied the format of the video-clips between-subjects to tap into the source-monitoring mechanisms responsible for the ‘doctored-evidence effect.’ The distribution of belief and memory distortions across conditions suggests that at least two mechanisms are involved: doctored images create an illusion of familiarity, and also enhance the perceived credibility of false suggestions. These findings offer insight into how external evidence influences source-monitoring.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): False memory syndrome, Autobiographical memory, Imagery (Psychology), Metacognition
Journal or Publication Title: Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1053-8100
Date: September 2009
Volume: Vol.18
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 773-780
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.04.011
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Bernstein et al., 2002 D.M. Bernstein, B.W.A. Whittlesea and E.F. Loftus, Increasing confidence in remote autobiographical memory and general knowledge: Extensions of the revelation effect, Memory & Cognition 30 (2002), pp. 432–438. Dror and Charlton, 2006 I.E. Dror and D. Charlton, Why experts make errors, Journal of Forensic Identification 56 (2006), pp. 600–616. Echterhoff et al., 2005 G. Echterhoff, W. Hirst and W. Hussy, How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics, Memory & Cognition 33 (2005), pp. 770–782. Garry and Gerrie, 2005 M. Garry and M.P. Gerrie, When photographs create false memories, Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (2005), pp. 321–325. Gohara, 2006 M.S. Gohara, A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques, Fordham Urban Law Journal 33 (2006), pp. 791–842. Henkel and Carbuto, 2008 L.A. Henkel and M. Carbuto, Remembering what we did: How source misattributions arise from verbalization, mental imagery, and pictures. In: M. Kelley, Editor, Applied memory, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY (2008), pp. 213–234. Jacoby et al., 1989 L.L. Jacoby, C.M. Kelley and J. Dywan, Memory attributions. In: H.L. Roediger III and F.I.M. Craik, Editors, Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1989), pp. 391–422. Johnson et al., 1988 M.K. Johnson, M.A. Foley, A.G. Suengas and C.L. Raye, Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 (1988), pp. 371–376. Johnson et al., 1993 M.K. Johnson, S. Hashtroudi and D.S. Lindsay, Source monitoring, Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993), pp. 3–28. Kassin and Gudjonsson, 2004 S.M. Kassin and G.H. Gudjonsson, The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (2004), pp. 33–67. Lindsay, 2008 Lindsay, D. S. (2008). Source monitoring. In J. H. Byrne (Series Ed.) & H. L. Roediger III (Vol. Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol. 2: Cognitive psychology of memory (pp. 325–348). Oxford: Elsevier. Lindsay et al., 2004 D.S. Lindsay, L. Hagen, J.D. Read, K.A. Wade and M. Garry, True photographs and false memories, Psychological Science 15 (2004), pp. 149–154. Mazzoni and Kirsch, 2002 G. Mazzoni and I. Kirsch, Autobiographical memories and beliefs: A preliminary metacognitive model. In: T.J. Perfect and B.L. Schwartz, Editors, Applied metacognition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2002), pp. 121–146. Moore, 2009 Moore, S. (2009). Science found wanting in nation’s crime labs. New York Times. <www.nytimes.com>. Retrieved 5.2.2009. Nash and Wade, 2009 R.A. Nash and K.A. Wade, Innocent but proven guilty: Eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence, Applied Cognitive Psychology 23 (2009), pp. 624–637. Nash et al., 2009 R.A. Nash, K.A. Wade and D.S. Lindsay, Digitally manipulating memory: Effects of doctored videos and imagination in distorting beliefs and memories, Memory & Cognition 37 (2009), pp. 414–424. Scoboria et al., 2004 A. Scoboria, G. Mazzoni, I. Kirsch and M. Relyea, Plausibility and belief in autobiographical memory, Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (2004), pp. 791–807. Smeets et al., 2005 T. Smeets, H. Merckelbach, R. Horselenberg and M. Jelicic, Trying to recollect past events: Confidence, beliefs, and memories, Clinical Psychology Review 25 (2005), pp. 917–934. Tversky and Kahneman, 1973 A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology 5 (1973), pp. 207–232. Vornik et al., 2003 L.A. Vornik, S.J. Sharman and M. Garry, The power of the spoken word: Sociolinguistic cues influence the misinformation effect, Memory 11 (2003), pp. 101–109. Wade and Garry, 2005 K.A. Wade and M. Garry, Strategies for verifying false autobiographical memories, American Journal of Psychology 118 (2005), pp. 587–602. Wade et al., 2002 K.A. Wade, M. Garry, J.D. Read and D.S. Lindsay, A picture is worth a thousand lies: Using false photographs to create false childhood memories, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002), pp. 597–603. Winkielman et al., 2003 P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz, R. Reber and T.A. Fazendeiro, Cognitive and affective consequences of visual fluency: When seeing is easy on the mind. In: L.M. Scott and R. Batra, Editors, Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2003), pp. 75–90. Wynne-Jones, 2008 Wynne-Jones, J. (2008, March 1). Web social networkers doctor photographs. <www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1580372/web-social-networkers-doctor-photographs.html>. Retrieved 10.2.2009. Young, 2008 Young, J. R. (2008, May 29). Journals find fakery in many images submitted to support research. Chronicle of Higher Education. <www.chronicle.com/free/2008/05/3028n.htm>. Retrieved 10.2.2009.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1061

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us