UNSPECIFIED (2002) Analogy in moral deliberation: the role of imagination and theory in ethics. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 28 (4). pp. 244-248. ISSN 0306-6800

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper develops themes addressed in an article by Eric Wiland in the Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:466-8, where he aims to contribute to the debate concerning the moral status of abortion, and to emphasise the importance of analogies in moral argument. In the present paper I try to secure more firmly a novel understanding of why analogy is an essential component in the attempt to justify moral beliefs. I seek to show how analogical argument both encapsulates and exercises the notions of rationality and imagination and that the construction, development, and comparison of analogies fundamentally underpins ethical argument. In so doing, it enables us to adopt imaginative and ethically illuminating perspectives but in a manner that does not relinquish any claims to intellectual rigour. I present a critique of a brand of "moral particularism" by showing how it cannot, if construed in a certain way, adequately conceive of how we use analogies and imaginary cases in ethics. Although such a particularism is thus impotent with regard to ethical debate, I show that the wider motivation behind particularism that can be extracted is of clear relevance and importance to medical practitioners.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics R Medicine H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences
Journal or Publication Title:	JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Publisher:	BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
ISSN:	0306-6800
Date:	August 2002
Volume:	28
Number:	4
Number of Pages:	5
Page Range:	pp. 244-248
Publication Status:	Published
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/10654

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item