Darnell, Judith and Wolstencroft, Peter (2018) The best of both worlds : pragmatism, personality, investigator greed, self-identity and the multi-skills set in the choice of mixed methods. (Submitted)

Preview

PDF WRAP-best-both-worlds-pragmatism-personality-investigator-Wolstencroft-2018.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (883Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Much research is reported to align with one of the two main traditional paradigms (positivism or interpretivism). However, when sufficiently explored, a cross-over exists between the two. As an example, much of the qualitative research which is reported to be reflective of the interpretivist paradigm is completed using positivist approaches (Crotty, 1998; Denzin and Lincoln, 2008). Additionally, quantitative researchers who engage in data collection often ignore the idea of reflexivity but undoubtedly influence participants in some way through their communication, body language and facial expression, despite initially assuming a positivist stance. On closer inspection, it transpires that elements from both of the traditional paradigms have often been used together within education-based research.

Item Type:	Submitted Journal Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) L Education > L Education (General)
Divisions:	Other > Centre for Lifelong Learning
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Qualitative research -- Methodology, Positivism, Education -- Research - Methodology
Official Date:	27 August 2018
Dates:	Date Event 27 August 2018 Submitted
Date of first compliant deposit:	28 August 2018
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Submitted
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders:	The Author(s)

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads