The Library
On combat effectiveness in the infantry platoon : beyond the primary group thesis
Tools
Tools
Tools
King, Anthony (2016) On combat effectiveness in the infantry platoon : beyond the primary group thesis. Security Studies, 25 (4). pp. 699-728. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1220205 ISSN 0963-6412.
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2016.1220205
Abstract
Since 2001, Western troops have been heavily engaged in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan raising once again the long-standing question of why small groups of soldiers are willing and able to fight together. Drawing on evidence from recent campaigns, and specifically focusing on American and British forces, this paper examines why small Western units have generally been effective in combat. Against the primary group thesis, originally proposed by Morris Janowitz and Edward Shils in 1948, the article claims that training and battle drills, not interpersonal relations, are the primary factor in generating performance on the battlefield. Moreover, high levels of training alters the relations between soldiers, giving rise to a core group which generates distinctive patterns of motivation.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Security Studies | ||||
| Publisher: | Routledge | ||||
| ISSN: | 0963-6412 | ||||
| Official Date: | 21 September 2016 | ||||
| Dates: |
|
||||
| Volume: | 25 | ||||
| Number: | 4 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 699-728 | ||||
| DOI: | 10.1080/09636412.2016.1220205 | ||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
