Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2002) Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 14 (2). pp. 111-118. ISSN 1353-4505

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective. To identify associations between the characteristics of general practitioners and practices, and patients' evaluations of the availability of general practice. Design. Written surveys completed by patients. Setting. General practice care in nine European countries: Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, UK, Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia), Switzerland, Slovenia and Spain. Study participants. 15 996 adult patients consecutively visiting the general practitioner (response rates per country varied between 47 and 89%). Main measures. The Europep instrument to assess patients' evaluations of five aspects of the availability of general practice care: (1) getting an appointment, (2) getting through on the phone, (3) being able to speak to the practitioner on the telephone, (4) waiting time in the waiting room, and (5) providing quick services for urgent health problems. Each general practitioner recorded age, sex, number of years in the practice, number of practitioners and other care providers in the practice, and urbanization level of the practice. Results. Patients' more positive evaluations were associated with fewer general practitioners in the practice, except for quick services for urgent health problems (range of conditional overall odds ratios, 1.69-2.02). In addition, a number of significant unconditional overall odds ratios were found, particularly those related to the number of general practitioners' working hours and the number of care providers in the practice. None of the associations was found consistently in all countries. Conclusion. Patients favour small practices and full-time general practitioners, which contradicts developments in general practice in many countries. Policy makers should consider how the tensions between patients' views and organizational developments can be solved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Journal or Publication Title: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS
ISSN: 1353-4505
Date: April 2002
Volume: 14
Number: 2
Number of Pages: 8
Page Range: pp. 111-118
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/10931

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us