Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

What you don't know... can't hurt you? A natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Azmat, Ghazala, Bagues, Manuel F., Cabrales, Antonio and Iriberri, Nagore (2019) What you don't know... can't hurt you? A natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Science, 65 (8). pp. 3714-3736. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3131

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-natural-field-experiment-relative-performance-feedback-higher-education-Bagues-2018.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1197Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3131

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of providing feedback to college students on their position in the grade distribution by using a natural field experiment. This information was updated every six months during a three-year period. We find that greater grades transparency decreases educational performance, as measured by the number of examinations passed and grade point average (GPA). However, self-reported satisfaction, as measured by surveys conducted after feedback is provided but before students take their examinations, increases. We provide a theoretical framework to understand these results, focusing on the role of prior beliefs and using out-of-trial surveys to test the model. In the absence of treatment, a majority of students underestimate their position in the grade distribution, suggesting that the updated information is “good news” for many students. Moreover, the negative effect on performance is driven by those students who underestimate their position in the absence of feedback. Students who overestimate initially their position, if anything, respond positively. The performance effects are short lived—by the time students graduate, they have similar accumulated GPA and graduation rates.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Journal or Publication Title: Management Science
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
ISSN: 0025-1909
Official Date: 14 May 2019
Dates:
DateEvent
14 May 2019Published
30 May 2018Accepted
Volume: 65
Number: 8
Page Range: pp. 3714-3736
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3131
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders: Copyright © 2019, INFORMS
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us