Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The path taken and not taken in social epistemology

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Fuller, Steve (2018) The path taken and not taken in social epistemology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48 (5). pp. 530-536. doi:10.1177/0048393118794994

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118794994

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

I respond to William Lynch’s critique of the sympathetic reading of my work provided by Remedios and Dusek in Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller’s Social Epistemology. Lynch harks back to my early works, which he sees as a promoting a ‘naturalism’ lacking in the later works. In response, I observe that my commitment to naturalism has always been ‘reflexive’, which has led me to break with conventional forms of naturalism, though sticking closely to the spirit of science.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN: 0048-3931
Official Date: 1 September 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
1 September 2018Published
13 August 2018Available
15 July 2018Accepted
Volume: 48
Number: 5
Page Range: pp. 530-536
DOI: 10.1177/0048393118794994
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us