The Library
The path taken and not taken in social epistemology
Tools
Tools
Tools
Fuller, Steve (2018) The path taken and not taken in social epistemology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48 (5). pp. 530-536. doi:10.1177/0048393118794994
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393118794994
Abstract
I respond to William Lynch’s critique of the sympathetic reading of my work provided by Remedios and Dusek in Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller’s Social Epistemology. Lynch harks back to my early works, which he sees as a promoting a ‘naturalism’ lacking in the later works. In response, I observe that my commitment to naturalism has always been ‘reflexive’, which has led me to break with conventional forms of naturalism, though sticking closely to the spirit of science.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Philosophy of the Social Sciences | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Sage Publications Ltd. | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0048-3931 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | 1 September 2018 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 48 | ||||||||
| Number: | 5 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 530-536 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1177/0048393118794994 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
