Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The environmental footprint: a method to determine the environmental impact of agricultural production

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Lillywhite, Robert. (2008) The environmental footprint: a method to determine the environmental impact of agricultural production. Aspects of Applied Biology, Vol.86 . pp. 61-68. ISSN 0265-1491

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_lillywhite_0380313-200709-lillywhite_2008.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (291Kb)
Official URL: http://www.aab.org.uk/

Abstract

The environmental impact of producing agricultural commodities is an increasingly important topic at a time when climate change, an increasing population and competing demands for food, fibre and fuel are placing heavy demands upon the environment. There are already various methods available for quantifying environmental impact; however, none of them are flexible enough to account for multiple indicators while producing a simple, easy to comprehend result. Life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used to quantify every aspect of a production process and in agriculture has proved valuable in quantifying the inputs and outputs of resources and pollutants that are associated with the production of food commodities. However, the amount of detail that makes the LCA such a valuable tool can also make the results difficult to interpret. Carbon dioxide equivalents (carbon footprints) can be used to quantify the greenhouse gases emitted during a production process and have the advantage, in comparison to the LCA, of presenting the results as a single figure. This approach, as used in the forthcoming PAS 2050, is ideally suited to the retail market but is too simplistic to account for all the environmental burdens that agricultural production entails. This paper introduces a hybrid method, the environmental footprint, which incorporates four environmental indicators (pesticides, greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication and acidification, and water use) and presents the result as a single figure on a per hectare basis.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Warwick HRI (2004-2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Agriculture -- Environmental aspects, Pollution prevention, Environmental protection, Eutrophication -- Control, Acidification, Pesticides -- Environmental aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Aspects of Applied Biology
Publisher: Association of Applied Biologists
ISSN: 0265-1491
Date: 2008
Volume: Vol.86
Page Range: pp. 61-68
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Great Britain. Dept. for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
References: Azapagic A, Emsley A, Hamerton I. 2003. Polymers: The Environment and Sustainable Development. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ISBN: 978-0-471-87740-0. Azapagic A, Roland C, Perdan S. (Eds). 2004. Sustainable Development in Practice: Case Studies for Engineers and Scientists. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ISBN: 978-0-470-85609-3 BS 14040. 2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – (1) Principles and framework & (2) Requirements and guidelines. London: British Standards Institution. 8 Beaton C. (Ed.). 2006. The Farm Management Handbook 2006/7. Edinburgh: SAC. IPCC. 2006. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Johnes P J. 1996. Evaluation and management of the impact of land use change on the nitrogen and phosphorus load delivered to surface waters: the export coefficient modelling approach. Journal of Hydrology 183:323–349. Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degnil J, Tette J. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 139:1–8. Lillywhite R D, Chandler D, Grant W, Lewis K, Firth C, Schmutz U, Halpin D. 2007. Environmental footprint and sustainability of horticulture (including potatoes) - A comparison with other agricultural sectors, pp. 1–159. Warwick: University of Warwick/ London: Defra. Milà i Canals L, Hospido A, Clift R, Truninger M, Hounsome B, Edwards-Jones G. 2007. Environmental effects and consumer considerations of consuming lettuce in the UK winter. In: LCA in Foods. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, 25–26 April 2007, Gothenburg, Sweden. Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. 1987. S. Treaty Document number 100–10, 1522 U.N.T.S. 29. 16 Septembr 1987. Nix J, Hill P, Edwards A. 2005. Farm Management Pocketbook, 36th Edition 2006. London: Imperial College. PAS 2050. 2008. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London: British Standards Institution. Silgram M, Waring R, Anthony S, Webb J. 2001. Intercomparison of national & IPCC methods for estimating N loss from agricultural land. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 60:189–195. Williams A. 2007. Comparative study of cut roses for the British market produced in Kenya and the Netherlands. Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1103

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us