Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

"Metarepresentation" and "interpersonal relatedness" as explanations of the symbolic play of autistic children

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Skelly, Allan Crawford (1995) "Metarepresentation" and "interpersonal relatedness" as explanations of the symbolic play of autistic children. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Skelly_1995.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (5Mb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b3252361~S15

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to examine whether the interpersonal relatedness approach or the metarepresentational (or "theory of mind") approach is a more adequate explanation of the symbolic play of children with autism. This was attempted first, by a comparative theoretical analysis of evidence presented in support of both theories to date, and second, by inclusion of affective and attentive variables in empirical studies of symbolic play in children with and without autism. The roles of affect and attention were crucial, because they are implicit in the interpersonal relatedness theory of symbolic development, but not considered at any length in the metarepresentational approach as it was originally proposed.

Current evidence in favour of both theories is presented in chapter I. It was found that findings from studies of 'false belief and symbolic play in autism suggest a 'cognitive deficit' (metarepresentational impairment), but there are also a number of 'affective' impairments which cannot be predicted by such a deficit. It was found that both theories do not have total empirical support.

Five empirical studies are presented in chapters 2-7. The influence of a musical stimulus on the symbolic play of children with and without autism is examined in chapters 2 and 4. It was found that more elicited symbolic play (which requires the child to produce the symbolic idea) was demonstrated by children without autism on the inclusion of a musical stimulus. The children with autism were not influenced by the music.

An attempt was then made to examine the role of affect and attention during symbolic play, by the development of a rating scale to measure perceived affective mood and attention-to- tasks, in chapters 3, 4, 5 and 6. The scale is used in chapters 4 and 6 to examine relationships of symbolic play, affective mood, and attention to tasks in children with and without autism. Some relationships between symbolic play, affect and attention were found in the children with autism. It was also found that over three occasions the children with autism looked at the experimenter less than the other children.

The possibility of a symbolic impairment in children with autism was examined in chapters 4, 6 and 7. Findings were inconsistent, probably because of methodological inconsistency between studies, and flaws in design. Because of this lack of consistent evidence it was not possible to support one of the theories and reject the other.

The general discussion (chapter 8) suggests that we cannot choose between the metarepresentational and interpersonal theories on the basis of current evidence, but there remain good reasons for both theories to continue to generate hypotheses to be tested. It is also suggested that recent integrative theories such as that of Baron-Cohen (1994) might bridge the theoretical opposition of Leslie and Hobson.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Austistic children -- Psychology, Symbolic play, Autistic children -- Recreation, Social interaction in children, Symbolism (Psychology) in children, Music and children
Official Date: November 1995
Dates:
DateEvent
November 1995Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of Psychology
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Lewis, Vicky, 1948- ; Collis, Glyn
Format of File: pdf
Extent: xiii, 173 leaves : charts
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us