Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Lütz, Susanne and Kranke, Matthias (2014) The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries. Review of International Political Economy, 21 (2). pp. 310-338. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.747104 ISSN 0969-2290.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-European-rescue-consensus-countries-Kranke-2014.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (472Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.747104

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The global financial crisis has transformed the relationship between the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union (EU). Until the crisis, the IMF had not lent to EU member states in decades, but now the two organisations closely coordinate their lending policies. In the Latvian and Romanian programmes, the IMF and the EU advocated different loan terms. Surprisingly, the EU embraced ‘Washington Consensus’-style measures more willingly than did the IMF, which much of the contemporary literature still portrays as an across-the-board promoter of orthodox macroeconomic policies. We qualify this stereotypical characterisation by arguing from a constructivist perspective that the degree of an organisation's autonomy from its members depends on the interpretation of its mandate. IMF staff viewed the Fund's technical mandate as an opportunity to react rather flexibly to the challenges of the latest crisis. By contrast, European Commission, as well as European Central Bank (ECB), staff interpreted the vast body of supranational rules as necessitating stricter adherence to economic orthodoxy. Thus, IMF lending policies were more flexible and, at least on fiscal issues, also less contractionary.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Global Financial Crisis, 2008-2009, Europe, Eastern -- Economic aspects, International Monetary Fund, European Union, European Commission
Journal or Publication Title: Review of International Political Economy
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 0969-2290
Official Date: 2014
Dates:
DateEvent
2014Published
22 February 2013Available
25 October 2012Accepted
Volume: 21
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 310-338
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2012.747104
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 20 December 2018
Date of first compliant Open Access: 20 December 2018
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
FM2011-426Freie Universität Berlinhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007537

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us