The Library
Developing an intervention around referral and admissions to intensive care : a mixed-methods study
Tools
Tools
Tools
(2020) Developing an intervention around referral and admissions to intensive care : a mixed-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 7 (39). doi:10.3310/hsdr07390 ISSN 2050-4349.
|
PDF
WRAP-developing-intervention-referral-admissions-intensive-care-Bassford-2019.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (44Mb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP- understanding-improving-decision-making-around-referral-admissions-intensive-care-Slowther-2019.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (6Mb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07390
Abstract
Background
Intensive care treatment can be life-saving, but it is invasive and distressing for patients receiving it and it is not always successful. Deciding whether or not a patient will benefit from intensive care is a difficult clinical and ethical challenge.
Objectives
To explore the decision-making process for referral and admission to the intensive care unit and to develop and test an intervention to improve it.
Methods
A mixed-methods study comprising (1) two systematic reviews investigating the factors associated with decisions to admit patients to the intensive care unit and the experiences of clinicians, patients and families; (2) observation of decisions and interviews with intensive care unit doctors, referring doctors, and patients and families in six NHS trusts in the Midlands, UK; (3) a choice experiment survey distributed to UK intensive care unit consultants and critical care outreach nurses, eliciting their preferences for factors used in decision-making for intensive care unit admission; (4) development of a decision-support intervention informed by the previous work streams, including an ethical framework for decision-making and supporting referral and decision-support forms and patient and family information leaflets. Implementation feasibility was tested in three NHS trusts; (5) development and testing of a tool to evaluate the ethical quality of decision-making related to intensive care unit admission, based on the assessment of patient records. The tool was tested for inter-rater and intersite reliability in 120 patient records.
Results
Influences on decision-making identified in the systematic review and ethnographic study included age, presence of chronic illness, functional status, presence of a do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation order, referring specialty, referrer seniority and intensive care unit bed availability. Intensive care unit doctors used a gestalt assessment of the patient when making decisions. The choice experiment showed that age was the most important factor in consultants’ and critical care outreach nurses’ preferences for admission. The ethnographic study illuminated the complexity of the decision-making process, and the importance of interprofessional relationships and good communication between teams and with patients and families. Doctors found it difficult to articulate and balance the benefits and burdens of intensive care unit treatment for a patient. There was low uptake of the decision-support intervention, although doctors who used it noted that it improved articulation of reasons for decisions and communication with patients.
Limitations
Limitations existed in each of the component studies; for example, we had difficulty recruiting patients and families in our qualitative work. However, the project benefited from a mixed-method approach that mitigated the potential limitations of the component studies.
Conclusions
Decision-making surrounding referral and admission to the intensive care unit is complex. This study has provided evidence and resources to help clinicians and organisations aiming to improve the decision-making for and, ultimately, the care of critically ill patients.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH) Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Critical care medicine -- Research, Referral, Medical, Intensive care units -- Admission and discharge -- Decision making | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Health Services and Delivery Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher: | NIHR Journals Library | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN: | 2050-4349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Date: | November 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume: | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number: | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DOI: | 10.3310/hsdr07390 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): | © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2019. This work was produced by Health Services and Delivery Research under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to NETSCC. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright Holders: | National Institute of Health Research | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 26 February 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 27 January 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Grant number: | 13/10/14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
