Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

How the sauce got to be better than the fish : scholarship and rivalry in Isaac Casaubon’s Studies of Ancient Satire

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

De Smet, Ingrid (2019) How the sauce got to be better than the fish : scholarship and rivalry in Isaac Casaubon’s Studies of Ancient Satire. Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 4 (3). pp. 275-315. doi:10.1163/24055069-00403001 ISSN 2405-5069.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Casaubon-sauce-definitive-erudition-De Smet-2019.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (797Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/24055069-00403001

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Isaac Casaubon’s 1605 Persius edition and its companion-piece, the De satyrica Graecorum poesi et Romanorum satira, likewise published in 1605, have long been considered milestones in the history of scholarship on Ancient satire. Marshalling evidence from humanist correspondences, annotated copies of early printed books, manuscripts and visual materials, this study offers a fresh and much fuller and more nuanced view of either book’s trajectory from concept to print and distribution, of the motivations and guiding principles behind Casaubon’s research, and, more generally, of scholarly endeavor around the turn of the seventeenth century. I demonstrate how Casaubon’s work on satire is linked to the humanist recovery of Ancient scholia, how its erudition integrates observations on the contemporary world and non-textual evidence, and how it is marked by fierce scholarly rivalry and – hitherto underestimated – confessional differences.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Arts > School of Modern Languages and Cultures > French Studies
Faculty of Arts > School of Modern Languages and Cultures
Journal or Publication Title: Erudition and the Republic of Letters
Publisher: Brill
ISSN: 2405-5069
Official Date: 28 June 2019
Dates:
DateEvent
28 June 2019Available
27 February 2019Accepted
Volume: 4
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 275-315
DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00403001
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 4 March 2019
Date of first compliant Open Access: 28 June 2021
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us