The Library
Quantifying age and model uncertainties in palaeoclimate data and dynamical climate models with a joint inferential inferential analysis
Tools
Tools
Tools
Carson, Jake, Crucifix, Michel, Preston, Simon and Wilkinson, Richard (2019) Quantifying age and model uncertainties in palaeoclimate data and dynamical climate models with a joint inferential inferential analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A : Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475 (2224). doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0854
|
PDF
WRAP-quantifying-age-model-uncertainties-palaeoclimate-data-dynamical-climate-models-Carson-2019.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1078Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-quantifying-age-model-uncertainties-palaeoclimate-data-dynamical-climate-Carson-2019.pdf - Published Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (802Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0854
Abstract
The study of palaeoclimates relies on information sampled in natural archives such as deep sea cores. Scientific investigations often use such information in multi-stage analyses, typically with an age model being fitted to a core to convert depths into ages at stage one. These age estimates are then used as inputs to develop, calibrate, or select climate models in a second stage of analysis. Here we show that such multi-stage approaches can lead to misleading conclusions, and develop a joint inferential approach for climate reconstruction, model calibration, and age estimation. As an illustration, we investigate the glacial-interglacial cycle, fitting both an age model and dynamical climate model to two benthic sediment cores spanning the past 780 kyr. To show the danger of a multi-stage analysis we sample ages from the posterior distribution, then perform model selection conditional on the sampled age estimates, mimicking standard practice. Doing so repeatedly for different samples leads to model selection conclusions that are substantially different from each other, and from the joint inferential analysis. We conclude that multistage analyses are insufficient when dealing with uncertainty, and that to draw sound conclusions the full joint inferential analysis should be performed.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Statistics | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Proceedings of the Royal Society A : Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | ||||||
| Publisher: | Royal Society Publishing | ||||||
| ISSN: | 1364-5021 | ||||||
| Official Date: | 17 April 2019 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 11 March 2019 | ||||||
| Volume: | 475 | ||||||
| Number: | 2224 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1098/rspa.2018.0854 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
