Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Delusional beliefs and reason giving

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Bortolotti, Lisa and Broome, Matthew R.. (2008) Delusional beliefs and reason giving. Philosophical Psychology , Vol.21 (No.6). pp. 821-841. ISSN 0951-5089

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Broome_0670707-140808-delusions_reasongiving.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (351Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515080802516212

Abstract

Delusions are often regarded as irrational beliefs, but their irrationality is not sufficient to explain what is pathological about them. In this paper we ask whether deluded subjects have the capacity to support the content of their delusions with reasons, that is, whether they can author their delusional states. The hypothesis that delusions are characterised by a failure of authorship, which is a dimension of self knowledge, deserves to be empirically tested because (a) it has the potential to account for the distinction between endorsing a delusion and endorsing a framework belief; (b) it contributes to a philosophical analysis of the relationship between rationality and self knowledge; and (c) it informs diagnosis and therapy in clinical psychiatry. However, authorship cannot provide a demarcation criterion between delusions and other irrational belief states.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Delusions, Schizophrenia, Pharmacology
Journal or Publication Title: Philosophical Psychology
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
ISSN: 0951-5089
Date: December 2008
Volume: Vol.21
Number: No.6
Page Range: pp. 821-841
Identification Number: 10.1080/09515080802516212
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Version accepted by publisher (post-print, after peer review, before copy-editing)
References: Andrenason, N. C. (2007). DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences. Schizophr Bull, 33: 108-112. Bayne, T. & Pacherie, E. (2005). In defence of the doxastic conception of delusion. Mind & Language, 20 (2): 163-188. Bayne, T. & Pacherie E. (2004). Bottom up or top down? Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology ,11 (1): 1-11. Bermudez, J. (2001), Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders Mind&Language, 16 (5): 493-457. Berridge, K. C. & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev, 28: 309-369. Berrios, G.E. (1991). Delusions as ‘wrong beliefs’: a conceptual history. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159 (suppl 14): 6-13. Bortolotti, L. & Broome, M.R. (2007). If you didn’t care, you wouldn’t notice: recognition and estrangement in psychopathology. Philosophy Psychiatry, & Psychology, 14(1): 39-42. Bortolotti, L. (2005). Delusions and the background of rationality. Mind & Language, 20(2): 189-208. Bortolotti, L. (2002). Marks of irrationality. In S. Clarke and T. Lyons (eds.) Scientific Realism and Common Sense: Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science (pp. 157-174). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Broome M. R., Johns L. C., Valli I., Woolley J.B., Tabraham, P., Valmaggia, L., Peters, E., Garety, P., & McGuire, P. (2007). Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 191: s38-42 Broome, M. R., Woolley, J. B., Johns, L. C., Valmaggia, L., Tabraham, P., Gafoor, R., Bramon, E. & McGuire, P. (2005b). Outreach and support in South London (OASIS): implementation of a clinical service for prodromal psychosis and the at risk mental state. European Psychiatry, 20: 372-378. Broome, M. R., Woolley, J. B., Tabraham, P., Johns, L., Bramon, E., Murray, G., Pariante, C., McGuire, P. & Murray, R. (2005a). What causes the onset of psychosis? Schizophr Res, 79: 23-34. Broome, M. (2004). Rationality in psychosis and understanding the deluded. Philosophy, Psychiatry, &Psychology, 11(1): 35- 41. Campbell, J. (2002). The Ownership of Thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 9 (1): 35-39. Campbell, J. (2001). Rationality, Meaning and the Analysis of Delusion. Philosophy, Psychiatry, &Psychology, 8 (2-3): 89-100. Campbell, J. (1999). Schizophrenia, the space of reasons and thinking as a motor process. The Monist, 82(4): 609-625. Carman, T. (2003). First persons: On Richard Moran’s Authority and Estrangement. Inquiry, 46: 395-408. Coltheart, M. (2005). Delusional belief. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57: 72-6. Currie, G. (2000). Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. In M. Coltheart and M. Davies (eds.). Pathologies of Belief (pp. 167–182). Oxford: Blackwell. Davies, M., Coltheart, M., Langdon, R. & Breen, N. (2002). Monothematic Delusions: Towards a Two- Factor Account. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 8(2/3): 133- 158. Eilan, N. (2000). On understanding schizophrenia. In D. Zahavi (Ed.) Exploring the self (pp. 97–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Ferrero, L. (2003). An elusive challenge to the authorship account. Philosophical Psychology, 16(4): 565-567. Gallagher, S. (2004). Neurocognitive models of schizophrenia: A neurophenomenological critique. Psychopathology, 37: 8-19. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(1): 14-21. Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P., Fowler, D., Freeman, D., & Kuipers, E. (2007). Implications for Neurobiological Research of Cognitive Models of Psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 37 (10): 1377-1391. Gerrans, P. (2001). Authorship and ownership of thoughts. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 8 (2-3): 231-237. Graham, G. & Stephens, G. (1994). Mind and mine. In G. Graham and G. Stephens (eds). Philosophical Psychology (pp. 91-109). Camnbridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Jaspers, K (1963). General Psychopathology. Transl. J. Hoenig and M. Hamilton. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Jeannerod, M. & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, Simulation and Self-identification. Mind & Language, 19(2): 113-146. Kapur, S. (2004). How antipsychotics become anti-’psychotic’--from dopamine to salience to psychosis. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 25: 402-406. Kapur, S. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 160: 13-23. Kapur, S., Arenovich, T., Agid, O., Zipursky, R., Lindborg, S., & Jones, B. (2005b). Evidence for onset of antipsychotic effects within the first 24 hours of treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 939-946. Kapur, S., Mizrahi, R. & Li, M. (2005a). From dopamine to salience to psychosis-- linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. Schizophrenia Research, 79, 59-68. Laruelle, M. & Abi-Dargham, A. (1999) Dopamine as the wind of the psychotic fire: new evidence from brain imaging studies. J Psychopharmacol, 13: 358-371. Lawlor, K. (2003). Elusive reasons: a problem for first-person authority. Philosophical Psychology, 16 (4): 549-564. Lewis, S. & Guthrie, E. (2002). Master Medicine: Psychiatry. Elsevier. Moran, R. (2001). Authority and Estrangement: an Essay on Self-knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Moran, R. (2004). Précis of Authority and Estrangement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXIX (2): 423-426. Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2004). Understanding Wittgenstein’s ‘On Certainty’. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Mullins, S. & Spence, S. (2003). Re-examining thought insertion. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 293-298. Parnas, J. & Handset, P. (2003). Phenomenology of Self-Experience in Early Schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 44 (2): 121-134. Samuels R, Stich S & Bishop, M. (2002). Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear. In R. Elio (ed.), Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality (pp. 236-268). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sass, L. A. (1994). The Paradoxes of Delusion. Cornell: Cornell University Press. Sims, A. (2003). Symptoms in the Mind. Saunders: Elsevier Publishing. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates. Stein, E. (1996). Without Good Reasons. New York: Oxford University Press. Stephens, G. L. & Graham, G. (2006) The delusional stance. In M. Cheung Chung, W. Fulford and G. Graham (eds.) Reconceiving Schizophrenia (ch.10). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stephens, G. L. & Graham, G. (2004). Reconceiving Delusions. International Review of Psychiatry, 16(3): 236-241. Stephens, G. L. & Graham, G. 2000. When Self-Consciousness Breaks: Alien Voices and Inserted Thoughts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Stone, T. & Young, A.W. (1997). Delusions and brain injury: the philosophy and psychology of belief. Mind and Language, 12, 327-364 Thornton, T. (forthcoming). Why the idea of framework propositions cannot contribute to an understanding of delusion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. Tversky A. & Thaler R. (1990). Anomalies: Preference Reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2), 201-11. Van der Gaag, M. (2006). A neuropsychiatric model of biological and psychological processes in the remission of delusions and auditory hallucinations. Schizophr Bul, 32, S113-S122. Velleman, J. (2005). The self as narrator. In J. Christman & J. Anderson (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: ;ew Essays (pp. 56-76). New York: Cambridge University Press. Wegner D. & Sparrow B. (2004). Authorship Processing. In Gazzaniga M. (ed.), The Cognitive ;eurosciences (pp.1201-1209). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. Wilson, T. & Hodges, S. (1994). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: the moderating role of attitude accessibility. Social Cognition, 11, 353-366. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell. Yager, J. & Gitlin, M.J. (2005). Clinical Manifestations of Psychiatric Disorders. In B. J. Sadock and V. A. Sadock (eds.) Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry Eighth Edition (pp. 964-1002), vol. 1. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia. Yung, A. R., Phillips, L. J., Yuen, H. P., Francey, S.M., McFarlane, C.A., Hallgren, M. & McGorry, P.D. (2003). Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk (‘prodromal’) group. Schizophr Res, 60, 21-32.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/116

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us