Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A worked example of initial theory-building : PARTNERS2 collaborative care for people who have experienced psychosis in England

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gwernan-Jones, Ruth, Britten, Nicky, Allard, Jon, Baker, Elina, Gill, Laura, Lloyd, Helen, Rawcliffe, Tim, Sayers, Ruth, Plappert, Humera, Gibson, John, Clark, Michael, Birchwood, Max, Pinfold, Vanessa, Reilly, Siobhan, Gask, Linda and Byng, Richard (2020) A worked example of initial theory-building : PARTNERS2 collaborative care for people who have experienced psychosis in England. Evaluation, 26 (1). pp. 6-26. doi:10.1177/1356389019850199 ISSN 1461-7153.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-worked-example-initial-care-people-psychosis-Birchwood-2019.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (2049Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019850199

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In this article, we present an exemplar of the initial theory-building phase of theory-driven evaluation for the PARTNERS2 project, a collaborative care intervention for people with experience of psychosis in England. Initial theory-building involved analysis of the literature, interviews with key leaders and focus groups with service users. The initial programme theory was developed from these sources in an iterative process between researchers and stakeholders (service users, practitioners, commissioners) involving four activities: articulation of 442 explanatory statements systematically developed using realist methods; debate and consensus; communication; and interrogation. We refute two criticisms of theory-driven evaluation of complex interventions. We demonstrate how the process of initial theory-building made a meaningful contribution to our complex intervention in five ways. Although time-consuming, it allowed us to develop an internally coherent and well-documented intervention. This study and the lessons learnt provide a detailed resource for other researchers wishing to build theory for theory-driven evaluation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Psychoses , Psychoses -- England
Journal or Publication Title: Evaluation
Publisher: SAGE Publications
ISSN: 1461-7153
Official Date: 1 January 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
1 January 2020Published
26 May 2019Available
31 October 2019Accepted
Volume: 26
Number: 1
Page Range: pp. 6-26
DOI: 10.1177/1356389019850199
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): Gwernan-Jones, R., Britten, N., Allard, J., Baker, E., Gill, L., Lloyd, H., … Byng, R. (2019). A worked example of initial theory-building: PARTNERS2 collaborative care for people who have experienced psychosis in England. Evaluation. Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. Additionally, please provide a link to the appropriate DOI for the published version of the Contribution on the SAGE Journals website https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019850199
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 20 November 2019
Date of first compliant Open Access: 20 November 2019

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us