Having a phone conversation delays but does not disrupt cognitive mechanisms

[thumbnail of WRAP-Having-phone-conversation-disrupt-cognitive-mechanisms-Kunar-20198.pdf]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Having-phone-conversation-disrupt-cognitive-mechanisms-Kunar-20198.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that talking on a mobile phone leads to impairments in a number of cognitive tasks. However, it is not yet known whether the act of conversation disrupts the underlying cognitive mechanisms (the Cognitive Disruption hypothesis) or leads to a delay in response due to a limit on central cognitive resources (the Cognitive Delay hypothesis). We investigated this here using two cognitive search tasks that investigate spatial learning and time-based selection: Contextual Cueing and Visual Marking. In Contextual Cueing, responses to repeated displays are faster than those to novel displays. In Visual Marking, participants prioritize attention to new information and deprioritize old, unimportant information (the Preview Benefit). Experiments 1 to 3 investigated whether Contextual Cueing occurred while people were engaged in a phone conversation, whereas Experiments 4 to 6 investigated whether a Preview Benefit occurred, again while people were engaged in conversation. The results showed that having a conversation did not interfere with the mechanisms underlying spatial learning or time-based selection. However, in all experiments there was a significant increase in response times. The results are consistent with a Cognitive Delay account explaining the dual-task cost of having a phone conversation on concurrent cognitive tasks.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Experimental Psychology : Applied
Publisher: American Psychological Association
ISSN: 1076-898X
Official Date: 2020
Dates:
Date
Event
2020
Published
29 August 2019
Available
9 June 2019
Accepted
Volume: 26
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 199-217
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000239
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Re-use Statement: ©American Psychological Association, 2019. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000239
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders: American Psychological Association
Date of first compliant deposit: 11 June 2019
Date of first compliant Open Access: 13 September 2019
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant ID
RIOXX Funder Name
Funder ID
UNSPECIFIED
[ESRC] Economic and Social Research Council
Related URLs:
URI: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/118198/

Export / Share Citation


Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item