
The Library
Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya’s female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930
Tools
Anderson, David (2018) Women missionaries and colonial silences in Kenya’s female ‘circumcision’ controversy, 1906–1930. The English Historical Review, 133 (565). pp. 1512-1545. doi:10.1093/ehr/cey325 ISSN 0013-8266.
|
PDF
WRAP-women-missionaries-colonial-silences-Kenyas-female-circumcision-controversy-1906–1930-Anderson-v2-2018.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (632Kb) | Preview |
|
![]() |
PDF
WRAP-women-missionaries-colonial-silences-Kenyas-female-circumcision-controversy-1906–1930-Anderson-v1-2018.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (544Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cey325
Abstract
For the people of Kenya, recent global debates on the emotional and medical harm caused by female genital mutilation (FGM), allied to arguments about the human rights of the women subjected to such acts, have a significant historical resonance. In the 1920s, Christian missionaries in central Kenya mounted a concerted campaign to prohibit ‘female circumcision’ among their flourishing African congregations. This provoked a backlash, with thousands of Kikuyu Christians deserting the missions to found their own independent churches and schools in the early 1930s. These events, commonly referred to as the ‘female circumcision controversy’, mark a turning point in Kenya’s colonial history. Taking as its starting-point the murder in 1930 of a female missionary with the African Inland Mission, the article explores the actions and attitudes of white women missionaries, revealing a subtle and complex picture of missionary views of African society and the process of Christian conversion, arguing that, as the circumcision crisis developed during 1929, these women stood at the centre of the gathering storm, their experience emblematic of the emotional, cultural and political challenges in the circumcision debate. This account adds an important new dimension to our understanding of gender in Kenya’s circumcision debate, but it also reveals why colonial silence has surrounded the event at the very centre of the crisis: the murder of Hulda Stumpf.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts > History | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | The English Historical Review | ||||||||
Publisher: | Oxford University Press | ||||||||
ISSN: | 0013-8266 | ||||||||
Official Date: | December 2018 | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Volume: | 133 | ||||||||
Number: | 565 | ||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 1512-1545 | ||||||||
DOI: | 10.1093/ehr/cey325 | ||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 7 February 2021 | ||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 7 February 2021 |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year