Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Innovation races and the strategic role of cash holdings : evidence from pharmaceutical patents

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Schroth, Enrique and Szalay, Dezsö (2007) Innovation races and the strategic role of cash holdings : evidence from pharmaceutical patents. Working Paper. Unpublished.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Szalay_cashraces_public_1007.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (404Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/...

Abstract

Firms that race to innovate first may hold cash not only to invest timely but also to do it faster than the competitors, pushing them to hold more cash. We use data from US patents and their citations to identify and measure the dependency of innovation success on cash holdings in such races. We find that a firm's cash holdings increase its probability of winning a race while its rivals' cash decrease it. The cash sensitivity of winning increases through the mid 80s and the 90s. This increase is due to the increased concentration of incumbency strength among fewer incumbents. Hence, cash holdings have become strategically more important for the average, R&D-intensive, firm.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Other > Learning and Development Centre
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Corporations -- Finance, Patents, Innovation
Journal or Publication Title: Unpublished
Publisher: Unpublished
Date: October 2007
Number of Pages: 58
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Working paper.
References: Almeida, Heitor, Murillo Campello, and Michael Weisbach, The Cash Flow Sen sitivity of Cash, Journal of Finance, 2004, 59 (4), 1777-1804. Alti, Aydogan, How Sensitive is Investment to Cash Flow When Financing is Frictionless?, Journal of Finance, 2003, 58, 707-722. Atanassov, Julian, Vikram Nanda, and Amit Seru, Finance and Innovation: The Case of Publicly Traded Firms, 2005. Working paper, University of Michigan and Arizona State University. Bates, Thomas, Kathleen Kahle, and René Stulz, Why Do U.S. Firms Hold so Much More Cash Than They Used to?, 2006. Working Paper, University of Arizona and Ohio State University. Berry, Steven, Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Di¤erentiation, RAND Journal of Economics, 1994, 25 (2), 242-262. Blundell, Richard, Rachel Griffith, and John Van Reenen, Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms,Review of Economic Studies, 1999, 66, 529-554. Bolton, Patrick and David Scharfstein, A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting, American Economic Review, 1990, 80, 93-106. Bond, Stephen, Dietmar Harhoff, and John Van Reenen, Investment, R&D and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany,Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 2003, Forthcoming. Cohen, Wesley, Richard Nelson, and John Walsh, Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), 2000. Working Paper No. 7552, NBER. Dasgupta, Partha and Joseph Stiglitz, Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D, The Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11 (1), 1-28. Erickson, Timothy and Toni Whited, Measurement Error and the Relationship Between Investment and Q, Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108, 1027-1057. Fazzari, Steven, Glenn Hubbard, and Bruce Petersen, Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988, 1, 141-195. , , and , Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115, 695-705. Foley, Fritz, Jay Hartzell, Sheridan Titman, and Garry Twite, Why Do Firms Hold So Much Cash? A Tax-Based Explanation, Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, forthcoming. Froot, Kenneth, David Scharfstein, and Jeremy Stein, Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Policies, Journal of Finance, 1993, 48, 1629-1658. Guedj, Ilan and David Scharfstein, Organizational Scope and Investment: Evidence from the Drug Development Strategies and Performance of Biopharmaceutical Firms, 2004. Working paper, MIT and Harvard Business School. Hall, Bronwyn, Exploring the Patent Explosion, 2004. NBER Working Paper No 10605. , Adam Ja¤e, and Manuel Trajtenberg, The NBER Patent-Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools, in Adam Ja¤e and Manuel Trajtenberg, eds., Patent, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, MIT Press, 2002, chapter 13, pp. 403-459. , , and , Market Value and Patent Citations, RAND Journal of Economics, 2005, 36 (1), 16-38. Haushalter, David, Sandy Klasa, and William Maxwell, The Influence of Product Market Dynamics on a Firm's Cash Holdings and Hedging Behavior, Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 84 (3), 797-825. Hennessy, Christopher, Amon Levy, and Toni Whited, Testing Q Theory with Financing Frictions, Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, Forthcoming. Ja¤e, Adam and Manuel Trajtenberg, Patents, Citations and Innovations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. Kaplan, Steven and Luigi Zingales, Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of FInancing Constraints?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112, 169-215. and , Investment-Casf Flow Sensitivities are Not Useful Measures of Financial Constraints, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000, 115, 707-712. Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Lon- don, UK: McMillan, 1936. Lanjouw, Jean and Mark Schankerman, The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators, 1999. NBER Working paper No. 7345. Levin, Richard, Alvin Klevorick, Richard Nelson, and Sidney Winter, Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987, 3, 783-831. Opler, Tim, Lee Pinkowitz, René Stulz, and RohanWilliamson, The Determinants of Corporate Cash Holdings, Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 52, 3-46. Petrin, Amil and Kenneth Train, Omitted Product Attributes in Discrete Choice Models, 2003. NBER Working Paper 9452. Reinganum, Jennifer, Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly, American Economic Review, 1983, 73, 741-748. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Stéphane Villeneuve, Liquidity Risk and Corporate Demand for Hedging Insurance, 2004. Working paper, University of Toulouse. Schroth, Enrique and Dezsö Szalay, Financially Constrained Innovation Races: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Patents, 2007. Working paper, HEC Lausanne and Warwick University. Whited, Toni, External Finance Constraints and the Intertemporal Pattern of Intermittent Investment, Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81, 467-502.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/124

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us