Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The reliabilty and validity of a revised version of the How I Think Questionnaire for men who have intellectual disabilities

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Daniel, Matthew R., Sadek, Susan A. and Langdon, Peter E. (2018) The reliabilty and validity of a revised version of the How I Think Questionnaire for men who have intellectual disabilities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24 (4). pp. 379-390. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284217

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284217

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to revise an existing measure of distorted cognitions, creating the How I Think Questionnaire – Intellectual Disabilities (HIT-IDs), and to investigate the reliability and validity of the revised questionnaire. To achieve our aims, we recruited 97 men with intellectual disabilities (IDs), with or without a history of engaging in criminal behaviour, and interviewed them on two occasions, inviting them to complete the HIT-IDs, along with measures of moral development and empathy. The results indicated that the internal consistency of the HIT-IDs was acceptable, and the test–retest reliability was good. The HIT-IDs discriminated well between offenders and non-offenders, and as expected, correlated positively with a measure of moral development and negatively with a measure of empathy. The HIT-IDs is a reliable and valid measure for use with men who have IDs.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR)
Journal or Publication Title: Psychology, Crime & Law
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1068-316X
Official Date: 2018
Dates:
DateEvent
2018Published
18 January 2017Available
30 December 2016Accepted
Volume: 24
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 379-390
DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284217
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • Other Repository

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us