The Library
Using online patient feedback to improve NHS services : the INQUIRE multimethod study
Tools
Tools
Tools
Powell, John, Atherton, Helen, Williams, Veronika, Mazanderani, Fadhila, Dudhwala, Farzana, Woolgar, Steve, Boylan, Anne-Marie, Fleming, Joanna, Kirkpatrick, Susan, Martin, Angela, van Velthoven, Michelle, de Iongh, Anya, Findlay, Douglas, Locock, Louise and Ziebland, Sue (2019) Using online patient feedback to improve NHS services : the INQUIRE multimethod study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 7 (38). pp. 1-150. doi:10.3310/hsdr07380
|
PDF
WRAP-using-online-patient-feedback-NHS-study-Atherton-2019.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (6Mb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07380
Abstract
Background
Online customer feedback has become routine in many industries, but it has yet to be harnessed for service improvement in health care.
Objectives
To identify the current evidence on online patient feedback; to identify public and health professional attitudes and behaviour in relation to online patient feedback; to explore the experiences of patients in providing online feedback to the NHS; and to examine the practices and processes of online patient feedback within NHS trusts.
Design
A multimethod programme of five studies: (1) evidence synthesis and stakeholder consultation; (2) questionnaire survey of the public; (3) qualitative study of patients’ and carers’ experiences of creating and using online comment; (4) questionnaire surveys and a focus group of health-care professionals; and (5) ethnographic organisational case studies with four NHS secondary care provider organisations.
Setting
The UK.
Methods
We searched bibliographic databases and conducted hand-searches to January 2018. Synthesis was guided by themes arising from consultation with 15 stakeholders. We conducted a face-to-face survey of a representative sample of the UK population (n = 2036) and 37 purposively sampled qualitative semistructured interviews with people with experience of online feedback. We conducted online surveys of 1001 quota-sampled doctors and 749 nurses or midwives, and a focus group with five allied health professionals. We conducted ethnographic case studies at four NHS trusts, with a researcher spending 6–10 weeks at each site.
Results
Many people (42% of internet users in the general population) read online feedback from other patients. Fewer people (8%) write online feedback, but when they do one of their main reasons is to give praise. Most online feedback is positive in its tone and people describe caring about the NHS and wanting to help it (‘caring for care’). They also want their feedback to elicit a response as part of a conversation. Many professionals, especially doctors, are cautious about online feedback, believing it to be mainly critical and unrepresentative, and rarely encourage it. From a NHS trust perspective, online patient feedback is creating new forms of response-ability (organisations needing the infrastructure to address multiple channels and increasing amounts of online feedback) and responsivity (ensuring responses are swift and publicly visible).
Limitations
This work provides only a cross-sectional snapshot of a fast-emerging phenomenon. Questionnaire surveys can be limited by response bias. The quota sample of doctors and volunteer sample of nurses may not be representative. The ethnographic work was limited in its interrogation of differences between sites.
Conclusions
Providing and using online feedback are becoming more common for patients who are often motivated to give praise and to help the NHS improve, but health organisations and professionals are cautious and not fully prepared to use online feedback for service improvement. We identified several disconnections between patient motivations and staff and organisational perspectives, which will need to be resolved if NHS services are to engage with this source of constructive criticism and commentary from patients
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine | ||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Great Britain. National Health Service -- Evaluation, Medical care -- Great Britain -- Evaluation, Patient satisfaction -- Great Britain, Patient participation -- Great Britain, Physicians (General practice) -- Rating of -- Great Britain | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Health Services and Delivery Research | ||||||
| Publisher: | NIHR Journals Library | ||||||
| ISSN: | 2050-4349 | ||||||
| Official Date: | 30 October 2019 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 31 October 2019 | ||||||
| Volume: | 7 | ||||||
| Number: | 38 | ||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 1-150 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.3310/hsdr07380 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | ||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
