The Library
The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? a multi-country natural experiment
Tools
Giacco, Domenico, Bird, V. J., Ahmad, T., Bauer, M., Lasalvia, A., Lorant, V., Miglietta, E., Moskalewicz, J., Nicaise, P., Pfennig, A., Welbel, M. and Priebe, S. (2020) The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? a multi-country natural experiment. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29 . pp. 1-9. e10. doi:10.1017/S2045796018000732 ISSN 2045-7979.
|
PDF
WRAP-same-or-different-psychiatrists-for-in-and-out-patient-treatment-a-multi-country-natural-experiment-Giacco-2018.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (279Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000732
Abstract
Aims
A core question in the debate about how to organise mental healthcare is whether in- and out-patient treatment should be provided by the same (personal continuity) or different psychiatrists (specialisation). The controversial debate drives costly organisational changes in several European countries, which have gone in opposing directions. The existing evidence is based on small and low-quality studies which tend to favour whatever the new experimental organisation is.
We compared 1-year clinical outcomes of personal continuity and specialisation in routine care in a large scale study across five European countries.
Methods
This is a 1-year prospective natural experiment conducted in Belgium, England, Germany, Italy and Poland. In all these countries, both personal continuity and specialisation exist in routine care. Eligible patients were admitted for psychiatric in-patient treatment (18 years of age), and clinically diagnosed with a psychotic, mood or anxiety/somatisation disorder.
Outcomes were assessed 1 year after the index admission. The primary outcome was re-hospitalisation and analysed for the full sample and subgroups defined by country, and different socio-demographic and clinical criteria. Secondary outcomes were total number of inpatient days, involuntary re-admissions, adverse events and patients’ social situation. Outcomes were compared through mixed regression models in intention-to-treat analyses. The study is registered (ISRCTN40256812).
Results
We consecutively recruited 7302 patients; 6369 (87.2%) were followed-up. No statistically significant differences were found in re-hospitalisation, neither overall (adjusted percentages: 38.9% in personal continuity, 37.1% in specialisation; odds ratio = 1.08; confidence interval 0.94–1.25; p = 0.28) nor for any of the considered subgroups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Whether the same or different psychiatrists provide in- and out-patient treatment appears to have no substantial impact on patient outcomes over a 1-year period. Initiatives to improve long-term outcomes of psychiatric patients may focus on aspects other than the organisation of personal continuity v. specialisation.
Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine R Medicine > RC Internal medicine |
|||||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Mental Health and Wellbeing Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
|||||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Community mental health services -- Research, Psychiatric hospital care -- Research, Medical care -- Evaluation, Psychiatrists, Mental health services -- Evaluation | |||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences | |||||||||
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press | |||||||||
ISSN: | 2045-7979 | |||||||||
Official Date: | 2020 | |||||||||
Dates: |
|
|||||||||
Volume: | 29 | |||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 1-9 | |||||||||
Article Number: | e10 | |||||||||
DOI: | 10.1017/S2045796018000732 | |||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | |||||||||
Copyright Holders: | Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 | |||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 10 December 2019 | |||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 10 December 2019 | |||||||||
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
|||||||||
Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year