Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? a multi-country natural experiment

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Giacco, Domenico, Bird, V. J., Ahmad, T., Bauer, M., Lasalvia, A., Lorant, V., Miglietta, E., Moskalewicz, J., Nicaise, P., Pfennig, A., Welbel, M. and Priebe, S. (2020) The same or different psychiatrists for in- and out-patient treatment? a multi-country natural experiment. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29 . pp. 1-9. e10. doi:10.1017/S2045796018000732

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-same-or-different-psychiatrists-for-in-and-out-patient-treatment-a-multi-country-natural-experiment-Giacco-2018.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (279Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000732

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Aims
A core question in the debate about how to organise mental healthcare is whether in- and out-patient treatment should be provided by the same (personal continuity) or different psychiatrists (specialisation). The controversial debate drives costly organisational changes in several European countries, which have gone in opposing directions. The existing evidence is based on small and low-quality studies which tend to favour whatever the new experimental organisation is.
We compared 1-year clinical outcomes of personal continuity and specialisation in routine care in a large scale study across five European countries.
Methods
This is a 1-year prospective natural experiment conducted in Belgium, England, Germany, Italy and Poland. In all these countries, both personal continuity and specialisation exist in routine care. Eligible patients were admitted for psychiatric in-patient treatment (18 years of age), and clinically diagnosed with a psychotic, mood or anxiety/somatisation disorder.
Outcomes were assessed 1 year after the index admission. The primary outcome was re-hospitalisation and analysed for the full sample and subgroups defined by country, and different socio-demographic and clinical criteria. Secondary outcomes were total number of inpatient days, involuntary re-admissions, adverse events and patients’ social situation. Outcomes were compared through mixed regression models in intention-to-treat analyses. The study is registered (ISRCTN40256812).
Results
We consecutively recruited 7302 patients; 6369 (87.2%) were followed-up. No statistically significant differences were found in re-hospitalisation, neither overall (adjusted percentages: 38.9% in personal continuity, 37.1% in specialisation; odds ratio = 1.08; confidence interval 0.94–1.25; p = 0.28) nor for any of the considered subgroups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes.
Conclusions
Whether the same or different psychiatrists provide in- and out-patient treatment appears to have no substantial impact on patient outcomes over a 1-year period. Initiatives to improve long-term outcomes of psychiatric patients may focus on aspects other than the organisation of personal continuity v. specialisation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Community mental health services -- Research, Psychiatric hospital care -- Research, Medical care -- Evaluation, Psychiatrists, Mental health services -- Evaluation
Journal or Publication Title: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 2045-7979
Official Date: 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
2020Published
18 December 2018Available
4 November 2018Accepted
Volume: 29
Page Range: pp. 1-9
Article Number: e10
DOI: 10.1017/S2045796018000732
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Copyright Holders: Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
602645Seventh Framework Programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011102
UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us