
The Library
Data for Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research : a meta-epidemiological study
Tools
Ayorinde, Abimbola, Williams , Iestyn, Mannion, Russell, Song, Fujian, Skrybant, Magdalena, Lilford, Richard and Chen, Yen-Fu (2020) Data for Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research : a meta-epidemiological study. [Dataset]
![]() |
Microsoft Excel (Data file)
PLOS ONE_Data File_publication and outcome reporting bias in HSDR reviews.xls - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (474Kb) |
Abstract
Strategies to identify and mitigate publication bias and outcome reporting bias are frequently adopted in systematic reviews of clinical interventions but it is not clear how often these are applied in systematic reviews relating to quantitative health services and delivery research (HSDR). We examined whether these biases are mentioned and/or otherwise assessed in HSDR systematic reviews, and evaluated associating factors to inform future practice. We randomly selected 200 quantitative HSDR systematic reviews published in the English language from 2007-2017 from the Health Systems Evidence database (www.healthsystemsevidence.org). We extracted data on factors that may influence whether or not authors mention and/or assess publication bias or outcome reporting bias. We found that 43% (n = 85) of the reviews mentioned publication bias and 10% (n = 19) formally assessed it. Outcome reporting bias was mentioned and assessed in 17% (n = 34) of all the systematic reviews. Insufficient number of studies, heterogeneity and lack of pre-registered protocols were the most commonly reported impediments to assessing the biases. In multivariable logistic regression models, both mentioning and formal assessment of publication bias were associated with: inclusion of a meta-analysis; being a review of intervention rather than association studies; higher journal impact factor, and; reporting the use of systematic review guidelines. Assessment of outcome reporting bias was associated with: being an intervention review; authors reporting the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), and; inclusion of only controlled trials. Publication bias and outcome reporting bias are infrequently assessed in HSDR systematic reviews. This may reflect the inherent heterogeneity of HSDR evidence and different methodological approaches to synthesising the evidence, lack of awareness of such biases, limits of current tools and lack of pre-registered study protocols for assessing such biases. Strategies to help raise awareness of the biases, and methods to minimise their occurrence and mitigate their impacts on HSDR systematic reviews, are needed.
Item Type: | Dataset | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
||||||
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School | ||||||
Type of Data: | Assessment of publication data and systematic reviews | ||||||
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Systematic reviews (Medical research), Medical care -- Evaluation -- Case studies, Medical care -- Quality control | ||||||
Publisher: | Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick | ||||||
Official Date: | 9 January 2020 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Status: | Not Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Media of Output (format): | .xls | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||
Copyright Holders: | University of Warwick | ||||||
Description: | Excel spreadsheet with column headings |
||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 9 January 2020 | ||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 9 January 2020 | ||||||
Grant number: | 15/71/06 | ||||||
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
||||||
Related URLs: | |||||||
Contributors: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year