The Library
Methylnaltrexone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation and gastrointestinal stasis in intensive care patients. Results from the MOTION trial
Tools
Tools
Tools
Patel, Parind B. , Brett, Stephen J., O'Callaghan, David, Anjum, Aisha, Cross, Mary, Warwick, Jane and Gordon, Anthony C. (2020) Methylnaltrexone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation and gastrointestinal stasis in intensive care patients. Results from the MOTION trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 46 . pp. 747-755. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05913-6
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-results-randomised-trial-opioid-gastro-stasis- Warwick-2020.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 3 February 2021. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1704Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05913-6
Abstract
Purpose:
Constipation can be a significant problem in critically unwell patients, associated with detrimental outcomes. Opioids are thought to contribute to the mechanism of bowel dysfunction. We tested if methylnaltrexone, a pure peripheral mu-opioid receptor antagonist, could reverse opioid-induced constipation.
Methods:
The MOTION trial is a multi-centre, double blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial to investigate whether methylnaltrexone alleviates opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in critical care patients. Eligibility criteria included adult ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated, receiving opioids and were constipated (had not opened bowels for a minimum 48 h) despite prior administration of regular laxatives as per local bowel management protocol. The primary outcome was time to significant rescue-free laxation. Secondary outcomes included gastric residual volume, tolerance of enteral feeds, requirement for rescue laxatives, requirement for prokinetics, average number of bowel movements per day, escalation of opioid dose due to antagonism/reversal of analgesia, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, incidence of diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile infection and finally 28 day, ICU and hospital mortality.
Results:
A total of 84 patients were enrolled and randomized (41 to methylnaltrexone and 43 to placebo). The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were generally well balanced. There was no significant difference in time to rescue-free laxation between the groups (Hazard ratio 1.42, 95% CI 0.82–2.46, p = 0.22). There were no significant differences in the majority of secondary outcomes, particularly days 1–3. However, during days 4–28, there were fewer median number of bowel movements per day in the methylnaltrexone group, (p = 0.01) and a greater incidence of diarrhoea in the placebo group (p = 0.02). There was a marked difference in mortality between the groups, with ten deaths in the methylnaltrexone group and two in the placebo group during days 4–28 (p = 0.007).
Conclusion:
We found no evidence to support the addition of methylnaltrexone to regular laxatives for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in critically ill patients; however, the confidence interval was wide and a clinically important difference cannot be excluded.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RC Internal medicine | |||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Clinical Trials Unit Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
|||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Constipation -- Treatment, Opioids -- Receptors, Clinical trials -- Methodology | |||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Intensive Care Medicine | |||||||||
| Publisher: | Springer | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 0342-4642 | |||||||||
| Official Date: | 3 February 2020 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 10 January 2020 | |||||||||
| Volume: | 46 | |||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 747-755 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00134-019-05913-6 | |||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||
| Publisher Statement: | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Intensive Care Medicine. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05913-6 | |||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | |||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
|||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
