Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Does it pay to bet on your favourite to win? Evidence on experienced utility from the 2018 FIFA World Cup experiment

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Kossuth, Lajos, Powdthavee, Nattavudh, Harris, Donna and Chater, Nick (2020) Does it pay to bet on your favourite to win? Evidence on experienced utility from the 2018 FIFA World Cup experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 171 . pp. 35-58. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.006 ISSN 0167-2681.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Does-pay-bet-favourite-win-evidence-Chater-2020.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (1385Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.006

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper examined whether people gained significant emotional benefits from not engaging in emotional hedging – betting against the occurrence of desired outcomes. Using the 2018 FIFA World Cup as the setting for our exploratory study, we found substantial reluctance among England supporters to bet against the success of the England football team in the tournament. This decision not to offset a potential loss through hedging did not pay off in people's happiness following an England win. However, it was associated with a sharp decrease in people's happiness following an England loss, which was a similar experience among subjects who were randomly assigned to bet for an England win. Post-match happiness was relatively more stable among those who chose to hedge or were randomly allocated to hedge. We conclude that people do not hedge enough partly because they tend to overestimate the expected diagnostic cost of betting against their social identity, while underestimate the negative emotional impact from betting on their favourite to win when they did not win.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
ISSN: 0167-2681
Official Date: March 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
March 2020Published
3 February 2020Available
9 January 2020Accepted
Volume: 171
Page Range: pp. 35-58
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.01.006
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 15 January 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 3 August 2021
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us