Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Intraosseous versus intravenous administration of adrenaline in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : a secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC2 placebo-controlled trial

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Nolan, Jerry P., Deakin, Charles D., Ji, Chen, Gates, Simon, Rosser, Andy, Lall, Ranjit and Perkins, Gavin D. (2020) Intraosseous versus intravenous administration of adrenaline in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest : a secondary analysis of the PARAMEDIC2 placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Medicine, 46 . pp. 954-962. doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7 ISSN 0342-4642.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-intraosseous-versus-intravenous-administration-adrenaline-patients-with-out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest-Nolan-2020.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1107Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Purpose:
To compare the effectiveness of the intravenous (IV) and intraosseous (IO) routes for drug administration in adults with a cardiac arrest enrolled in the Pre-Hospital Assessment of the Role of Adrenaline: Measuring the Effectiveness of Drug Administration in Cardiac Arrest (PARAMEDIC2) randomised, controlled trial.

Methods:
Patients were recruited from five National Health Service Ambulance Services in England and Wales from December 2014 through October 2017. Patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were unresponsive to initial resuscitation attempts were randomly assigned to 1 mg adrenaline or matching placebo. Intravascular access was established as soon as possible, and IO access was considered if IV access was not possible after two attempts.

Results:
Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 3631 received adrenaline and 3686 received placebo. Amongst these, 1116 (30.1%) and 1121 (30.4%) received the study drug via the IO route. The odds ratios were similar in the IV and IO groups for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital handover [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.07 (95% CI 3.42–4.85) and (aOR 3.98 (95% CI 2.86–5.53), P value for interaction 0.90]; survival to 30 days [aOR 1.67 (1.18–2.35) versus 0.9 (0.4–2.05), P = 0.18]; and favourable neurological outcome [aOR 1.39 (0.93–2.06) versus 0.62 (0.23–1.67), P = 0.14].

Conclusion:
There was no significant difference in treatment effect (adrenaline versus placebo) on ROSC at hospital handover between drugs administered by the intraosseous route or by the intravenous route. We could not detect any difference in the treatment effect between the IV and IO routes on the longer term outcomes of 30-day survival or favourable neurological outcome at discharge (ISRCTN73485024).

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Cardiac arrest -- Treatment -- Great Britain, Cardiac resuscitation, Intravenous therapy, Emergency medicine -- Research
Journal or Publication Title: Intensive Care Medicine
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 0342-4642
Official Date: May 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
May 2020Published
30 January 2020Available
14 January 2020Accepted
Volume: 46
Page Range: pp. 954-962
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Intensive Care Medicine. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05920-7
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 6 February 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 30 January 2021
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIED[NIHR] National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
UNSPECIFIEDBritish Heart Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
UNSPECIFIEDHealth and Care Research Waleshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012068
UNSPECIFIEDResuscitation Council (UK)http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012358

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us