Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability : a mixed methods study of the views of adults, carriers and family members living with thalassemia in the UK

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Boardman, Felicity K., Clark, Corinna C. A., Jungkurth, Elsita and Young, Philip J. (2020) Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability : a mixed methods study of the views of adults, carriers and family members living with thalassemia in the UK. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 29 (6). pp. 1026-1040. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1231 ISSN 1059-7700.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-social-cultural-influences-genetic-screening-programme-acceptability-Boardman-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1022Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP-social-cultural-influences-genetic-screening-programme-acceptability-Boardman-2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1506Kb)
[img] PDF
WRAP-supplementary-material-tables-2020.pdf - Supplemental Material
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (517Kb)
[img] PDF
WRAP-appendix-1-interview-guide-2020.pdf - Supplemental Material
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (421Kb)
[img] PDF
WRAP-appendix-2-interview-guide-2020.pdf - Supplemental Material
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (398Kb)
[img] PDF
WRAP-appendix-3-survey-2020.pdf - Supplemental Material
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (654Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1231

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

As population‐level carrier screening panels for reprogenetic information emerge globally, conditions to be included, and the timing of implementation is widely debated. Thalassemia is the only condition for which population‐based prenatal carrier screening is offered in the UK. However, little is known about the views and experiences of the UK thalassemia‐affected community toward this screening or other forms of genetic screening for thalassemia (newborn, preconception), despite the range of direct consequences of screening programmes for this group.

Using a mixed‐methods integrative analysis (qualitative interviews n = 20 and quantitative survey n = 80), this study outlines the experiences and attitudes of adults with thalassemia, their family members, and screen‐identified thalassemia carriers toward preconception, prenatal, and newborn screening for thalassemia. The majority of participants described thalassemia as a burdensome condition with a range of negative impacts, which contributed to their strong support for screening in all its potential formats. However, the data also highlight the challenges of each screening mode for this group, reflected in the high level of value conflict in participants' accounts and decisions. Cultural, social, and (to a lesser extent) religious factors were found to mitigate against the advantages of early screens, particularly within faith communities. Social stigma emerged as key to this process, informing the way that thalassemia severity was not only perceived, but also experienced by affected adults, which ultimately influenced screening uptake and outcomes.

These findings suggest that cultural and social sensitivity is as important as the mode of screening delivery itself, if the iatrogenic and unintended harms of screening—particularly the social/psychological burden of value conflict—are to be adequately addressed and minimized.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RB Pathology
R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH)
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Genetic screening -- Moral and ethical aspects, Thalassemia, Genetic disorders -- Diagnosis -- Moral and ethical aspects, Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Moral and ethical aspects
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Genetic Counseling
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 1059-7700
Official Date: December 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2020Published
1 March 2020Available
20 February 2020Accepted
Volume: 29
Number: 6
Number of Pages: 15
Page Range: pp. 1026-1040
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1231
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 6 February 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 5 May 2020
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
203384/Z/16/Z Wellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010269
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us