Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The optimal choice of pre-launch reviewer: how best to transmit information using tests and conditional pricing

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Gill, David, 1975- and Sgroi, Daniel (2008) The optimal choice of pre-launch reviewer: how best to transmit information using tests and conditional pricing. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Gill_twerp_877.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (511Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

A principal who knows her type can face public testing to help attract endorsements from agents. Tests are pass/fail and have an innate toughness (bias) corresponding to a trade-off between the higher probability of passing a softer test and the greater impact on agents’ beliefs from passing a tougher test. Conditional on the test result, the principal also selects the price of endorsement. The principal always wants to be tested, and chooses the toughest or softest test available depending upon the precision of the agents’ and tests’ information. Applications abound in industrial organization, political economy and labor economics.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Commercial products -- Testing, Bayesian statistical decision theory, Information asymmetry, Communication -- Economic aspects, Advertising -- New products
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 19 November 2008
Number: No.877
Number of Pages: 34
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Albano, G. L. and Lizzeri, A. (2001) ‘Strategic Certification and Provision of Quality’, International Economic Review, 42, 267-283. Bose, S., Orosel, G., Ottaviani, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2007) ‘Dynamic Monopoly Pricing with Herding’, RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 910-928. Bose, S., Orosel, G., Ottaviani, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2008) ‘Monopoly Pricing in the Binary Herding Model’, Economic Theory, 37, 203-241. Calvert, R. L. (1985) ‘The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice’, Journal of Politics, 47, 530-555. Caminal, R. and Vives, X. (1996) ‘Why Market Shares Matter: An Information-Based Theory’, RAND Journal of Economics, 27, 221-239. Caminal, R. and Vives, X. (1999) ‘Price Dynamics and Consumer Learning’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8, 95-131. Chamley, C. P. (2004) Rational Herds: Economic Models of Social Learning, Cambridge University Press. Chiao, B., Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2007) ‘The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis’, RAND Journal of Economics, 38, 905-930. Demange, G. (2008) ‘Sharing Information in Web Communities’, Paris School of Economics Working Papers 2008-34. Farhi, E., Lerner, J. and Tirole J. (2005) ‘Certifying New Technologies’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 734-744. Gill, D. and Sgroi, D. (2008) ‘Sequential Decisions with Tests’, Games and Economic Behavior, 63, 663-678. Judd, K. L. and Riordan, M. (1994) ‘Price and Quality in a New Product Monopoly’, Review of Economic Studies, 61, 773-789. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2006) ‘A Model of Forum Shopping’, American Economic Review, 96, 1091-1113. Lizzeri, A. (1999) ‘Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries’, RAND Journal of Economics, 30, 214-231. Mahenc, P. (2004) ‘Influence of Informed Buyers in Markets Susceptible to the Lemons Problem’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 649-659. Milgrom, P. R. (1981), ‘Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications’, Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 380-391. Ottaviani, M. and Prat, A. (2001) ‘The Value of Public Information in Monopoly’, Econometrica, 69, 1673-1683. Rockafellar, R. T. (1970) Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press. Sah, R. K. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1986), ‘The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies’, American Economic Review, 76, 716-727. Sgroi, D. (2002) ‘Optimizing Information in the Herd: Guinea Pigs, Profits and Welfare’, Games and Economic Behavior, 39, 137-166. Taylor, C. R. (1999) ‘Time-on-the-Market as a Sign of Quality’, Review of Economic Studies, 66, 555-578. Welch, I. (1992) ‘Sequential Sales, Learning, and Cascades, Journal of Finance, 47, 695-732.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1340

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us