The Library
National autonomy or transnational solidarity? Using multiple geographic frames to politicize EU trade policy
Tools
Tools
Tools
Siles-Brügge, Gabriel and Strange, M. (2020) National autonomy or transnational solidarity? Using multiple geographic frames to politicize EU trade policy. Politics and Governance, 8 (1). pp. 277-289. doi:10.17645/pag.v8i1.2649
|
PDF
WRAP-national-autonomy-transnational-solidarity-use-multiple-geographic-frames-politicize-EU-trade-policy-Siles-Brugge-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (568Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-National-autonomy-solidarity-multiple-politicize-GATS and TTIP negotiations-Siles-Brügge-2020.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1447Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2649
Abstract
The article contributes to our understanding of how trade is politicized and how civil society activists manage the tensions between multiple collective action frames in a complex political context. When viewed alongside the Brexit referendum and Trump’s US Presidency, it is easy to see the 2013–2016 campaign against a European Union–US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership as a further example of an apparently growing populist ‘nationalism.’ Yet, in the European context—where campaigning was most visible—there was in fact extensive reliance on, and re-iteration of, a transnational ‘European’ frame, with antecedents in the 1999–2006 campaign against General Agreement on Trade in Services negotiations. As the article argues, transnational campaigning operates within a nexus of multiple, and sometimes conflicting, geographic frames. In both campaigns discussed here, activists typically engaged with the wider public via the national context and, sometimes, with allusions to ‘national autonomy.’ However, their activism was dependent upon a frame espousing ‘transnational solidarity.’ Developed over time, this structured their transnational relations with other groups and more full-time activists.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HF Commerce |
|||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies | |||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | General Agreement on Trade in Services (Organization) , Foreign trade regulation, Service industries -- Government policy, Foreign trade regulation -- United States, Foreign trade regulation -- European Union countries | |||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Politics and Governance | |||||||||
| Publisher: | Cogitatio Press | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 2183-2463 | |||||||||
| Official Date: | 31 March 2020 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 6 March 2020 | |||||||||
| Volume: | 8 | |||||||||
| Number: | 1 | |||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 277-289 | |||||||||
| DOI: | 10.17645/pag.v8i1.2649 | |||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | |||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
|||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
