Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Realistic assumptions about spatial locations and clustering of premises matter for models of foot-and-mouth disease spread in the United States

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Sellman, Stefan, Tildesley, Michael J., Burdett, Christopher L., Miller, Ryan S., Hallman, Clayton, Webb, Colleen T., Wennergren, Uno, Portacci, Katie and Lindström, Tom (2020) Realistic assumptions about spatial locations and clustering of premises matter for models of foot-and-mouth disease spread in the United States. PLoS Computational Biology, 16 (2). e1007641. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007641 ISSN 1553-7358.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-realistic-assumptions-spatial-locations-clustering-foot-mouth-Tildesley-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (2676Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007641

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Spatially explicit livestock disease models require demographic data for individual farms or premises. In the U.S., demographic data are only available aggregated at county or coarser scales, so disease models must rely on assumptions about how individual premises are distributed within counties. Here, we addressed the importance of realistic assumptions for this purpose. We compared modeling of foot and mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks using simple randomization of locations to premises configurations predicted by the Farm Location and Agricultural Production Simulator (FLAPS), which infers location based on features such as topography, land-cover, climate, and roads. We focused on three premises-level Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Removed models available from the literature, all using the same kernel approach but with different parameterizations and functional forms. By computing the basic reproductive number of the infection (R0) for both FLAPS and randomized configurations, we investigated how spatial locations and clustering of premises affects outbreak predictions. Further, we performed stochastic simulations to evaluate if identified differences were consistent for later stages of an outbreak. Using Ripley's K to quantify clustering, we found that FLAPS configurations were substantially more clustered at the scales relevant for the implemented models, leading to a higher frequency of nearby premises compared to randomized configurations. As a result, R0 was typically higher in FLAPS configurations, and the simulation study corroborated the pattern for later stages of outbreaks. Further, both R0 and simulations exhibited substantial spatial heterogeneity in terms of differences between configurations. Thus, using realistic assumptions when de-aggregating locations based on available data can have a pronounced effect on epidemiological predictions, affecting if, where, and to what extent FMD may invade the population. We conclude that methods such as FLAPS should be preferred over randomization approaches.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Foot-and-mouth disease , Foot-and-mouth disease -- United States, Foot-and-mouth disease -- Transmission -- Mathematical models -- United States
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher: Public Library of Science
ISSN: 1553-7358
Official Date: 20 February 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
20 February 2020Published
8 January 2020Accepted
Volume: 16
Number: 2
Article Number: e1007641
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007641
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 3 April 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 3 April 2020
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
HSHQDC-13-B0028U.S. Department of Homeland Securityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000180
D15PC00278U.S. Department of Homeland Securityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000180
Related URLs:
  • https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100...
  • https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC705377...
  • https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC705377...

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us