Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part one: theory

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2000) The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part one: theory. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 25 (2). pp. 131-162. ISSN 0361-3682

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

To appreciate the social significance of accounting today we must study it in changing socio-historical contexts and understand its ideas and techniques as products and producers of history. This paper (Part One) and a subsequent paper (Bryer, The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part two: evidence, in press) argue for a social history of accounting change. In social history no theme has been more important than the meaning of modernity, and no explanation more debated than Marxs theory of the transition to capitalism in England. The papers argue that historians of accounting can make a major contribution to this debate. Part One uses accounting ideas to explain Marx's theory. Many believe his theory is ambiguous or relies on teleology or economic determinism. Sociologists often repeat Weber's argument that Marx overlooked the cultural foundations of socio-economic action; the need for a transition to the calculative mentality of modern capitalism. Marxist historians dispute whether the primary cause was the rise of trade or class conflict in agriculture. While historical evidence broadly supports the class conflict view, controversy continues. This paper shows that, when translated into accounting ideas. Marx's theory is unambiguous; relies neither on teleology nor economic determinism; is historically testable; includes class conflict in trade and agriculture, and calculative mentalities as necessary and sufficient causes of capitalism and. we argue. modern accounting. Part Two provides evidence consistent with Marxs theory from accounting, records produced during the English agricultural, commercial, and bourgeois revolutions. It concludes that accounting fur the transition to capitalism should have a high priority on the research agenda of accounting historians. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Journal or Publication Title: ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY
Publisher: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
ISSN: 0361-3682
Date: February 2000
Volume: 25
Number: 2
Number of Pages: 32
Page Range: pp. 131-162
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/13556

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us