Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Joining techniques for aluminium spaceframes used in automobiles Part II - adhesive bonding and mechanical fasteners

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (2000) Joining techniques for aluminium spaceframes used in automobiles Part II - adhesive bonding and mechanical fasteners. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 99 (1-3). pp. 72-79. ISSN 0924-0136

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Concerns regarding the environmental impact of motor vehicles are driving automotive manufacturers to develop lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicles. Such a task is further compounded by customer demands for greater performance and more luxury and safety features, all of which tend to increase vehicle weight. Aluminium spaceframe body structures substantially reduce weight relative to traditional steel monocoques, whilst maintaining essential strength and stiffness. Such structures also present a considerable challenge for fabrication in volume production. This paper considers adhesive bonding and mechanical fasteners as potential techniques for the joining of spaceframe components in volume production. Production issues pertinent to the automotive industry are discussed in conjunction with a consideration of the physical properties of the joint produced. Comparisons are also made with welding techniques discussed in Part I of this paper. Whilst the findings show that processing problems associated with each technique differ in nature, the overriding issues remain common to all. No one technique discussed was found to provide an ideal combination of low cost, process reliability, consistently good quality, good microstructural integrity, high strength, and excellent impact and durability performance. However, whilst a definitive solution is not evident, it is concluded that a combination of techniques could be utilised to great effect. Such an approach could capitalise on the benefits of certain techniques, whilst at the same time minimising or eliminating some of their more significant shortcomings. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: T Technology
T Technology > TS Manufactures
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Journal or Publication Title: JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
ISSN: 0924-0136
Date: 1 March 2000
Volume: 99
Number: 1-3
Number of Pages: 8
Page Range: pp. 72-79
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/13594

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us