The Library
Email consultations between patients and doctors in primary care : a content analysis
Tools
Atherton, Helen, Boylan, A. M., Eccles, Abi, Fleming, Joanna, Goyder, C. R. and Morris, R. L. (2020) Email consultations between patients and doctors in primary care : a content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (11). e18218. doi:10.2196/18218 ISSN 1438-8871.
|
PDF
WRAP-email-consultations-between-patients-doctors-primary-care-Atherton-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (126Kb) | Preview |
|
PDF
WRAP-email-consultations-between-patients-doctors-primary-care-Atherton-2020.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (987Kb) |
||
PDF
WRAP-A-content-email-consultations-patients-Atherton-2020.pdf - Submitted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (964Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.2196/18218
Abstract
Background: Increasingly consultations in healthcare settings are carried out remotely, using a range of communications technologies. Email allows for a two-way text based communication, occurring asynchronously. Studies have explored the content and nature of email consultations as a way to understand the use, structure and function of email consultation. The majority of previous content analyses of email consultation in primary care settings have been conducted in North America and these have shown that concerns and assumptions about how email consultation might work have not been realised. There has not been a United Kingdom (UK) based content analysis of email consultations.
Objectives: To explore and delineate content of consultations conducted via email in English general practice, by conducting a content analysis of email consultations between General Practitioners (GPs) and patients.
Methods: We conducted a content analysis of anonymised email consultations between GPs and patients in two general practices in the United Kingdom. We examined the descriptive elements of the correspondence to ascertain when emails were sent, how many emails were in an email consultation and the nature of the content. We used a normative approach to analyse the content of email consultations to explore the use of and function of email consultation.
Results: We obtained 100 email consultations from 85 patients, this totalled 262 individual emails. The majority of email users were aged over 40 and over half of users were male. Email consultations were mostly short and completed in a few days. Emails were mostly sent and received during the day. Emails were mostly clinical in content rather than administrative and covered a wide range of clinical presentations. There were three key themes to the use and function of the email consultations; the role of the GP and email consultation, the transactional nature of an email consultation and the operationalisation of email consultation.
Conclusions: Where email is used to have a consultation with a patient in general practice in the majority of cases the consultation is short, clinical in nature and resolved quickly. GPs approach email consultation using similar key elements of the face-to-face consultation, however, using email consultation has the potential to alter the role of the GP, leading them to engage in more administrative tasks than usual. Email consultation was not a replacement for a face-to-face consultation.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH) Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Medical Internet Research | ||||||||
Publisher: | Journal of Medical Internet Research | ||||||||
ISSN: | 1438-8871 | ||||||||
Official Date: | 9 November 2020 | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Volume: | 22 | ||||||||
Number: | 11 | ||||||||
Article Number: | e18218 | ||||||||
DOI: | 10.2196/18218 | ||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 25 September 2020 | ||||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 22 December 2020 | ||||||||
Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year