Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Percentage and currency framing of house-edge gambling warning labels

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Newall, Philip W. S., Walasek, Lukasz and Ludvig, Elliot Andrew (2020) Percentage and currency framing of house-edge gambling warning labels. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction . doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00286-0 (In Press)

[img] PDF
WRAP-Percentage-currency-framing-house-edge-gambling-warning-2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 8 May 2021. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (334Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00286-0

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

All commercial gambling games are constructed so that the gamblers will on average lose money over time. This fact is often communicated to gamblers on virtual gambling games as the “return-to-player.” A return-to-player of 90% means that for every £100 bet, on average £90 is paid back out in prizes. In previous work, gamblers were better informed, and perceived a lower chance of winning, when this information was equivalently reframed as a “house-edge” of 10%, whereby the game keeps 10% of all money bet on average. This paper explores whether there are further risk communication advantages to using currency framing for the house-edge format, by directly stating the amount kept as: “This game keeps £10 for every £100 bet on average.” Online gamblers (N = 1,007) reported their perceived chances of winning for hypothetical games with house-edges of either 0.5%, 7.5%, or 15%, presented as either percentages or currency units. Gamblers’ perceived chances of winning were only minimally affected by this framing of house-edge information.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Gambling -- Psychological aspects, Risk communication, Decision making -- Econometric models
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Publisher: Springer
ISSN: 1557-1874
Official Date: 8 May 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
8 May 2020Available
16 April 2020Accepted
Date of first compliant deposit: 22 April 2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00286-0
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Publisher Statement: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. The final authenticated version is available online at:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00286-0
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us