UNSPECIFIED (2000) Public understanding of medical terminology: non-English speakers may not receive optimal care. JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 17 (2). pp. 119-121. ISSN 1351-0622

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Introduction-Many systems of telephone triage are being developed (including NHS Direct, general practitioner out of hours centres, ambulance services). These rely on the ability to determine key facts from the caller. Level of consciousness is an important indicator after head injury but also an indicator of severe illness. Aims-To determine the general public's understanding of the term unconscious. Methods-A total of 700 people were asked one of seven questions relating to their understanding of the term unconscious. All participants were adults who could speak sufficient English to give a history to a nurse. Results-Correct understanding of the term unconscious varied from 46.5% to 87.0% for varying parameters. Those with English as their first language had a better understanding (p<0.01) and there was a significant variation with ethnicity (p<0.05). Conclusions-Understanding of the term unconscious is poor and worse in those for whom English is not a first language. Decision making should not rely on the interpretation of questions using technical terms such as unconscious, which may have a different meaning between professional and lay people.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > RC Internal medicine
Journal or Publication Title:	JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Publisher:	BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
ISSN:	1351-0622
Date:	March 2000
Volume:	17
Number:	2
Number of Pages:	3
Page Range:	pp. 119-121
Publication Status:	Published
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/13659

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item