Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Disfluent difficulties are not desirable difficulties : the (lack of) effect of Sans Forgetica on memory

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Taylor, Andrea, Sanson, Mevagh, Burnell, Ryan, Wade, Kimberley A. and Garry, Maryanne (2020) Disfluent difficulties are not desirable difficulties : the (lack of) effect of Sans Forgetica on memory. Memory . doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726 (In Press)

[img] PDF
WRAP-disfluent-difficulties-not-desirable-difficulties-the-(lack of)-effect-Sans-Forgetica-memory-Wade-2020.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 4 May 2021. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (865Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Scientists working at the intersection of cognitive psychology and education have developed theoretically-grounded methods to help people learn. One important yet counterintuitive finding is that making information harder to learn – that is, creating desirable difficulties – benefits learners. Some studies suggest that simply presenting information in a difficult-to-read font could serve as a desirable difficulty and therefore promote learning. To address this possibility, we examined the extent to which Sans Forgetica, a newly developed font, improves memory performance – as the creators of the font claim. Across four experiments, we set out to replicate unpublished findings by the font’s creators. Subjects read information in Sans Forgetica or Arial, and rated how difficult the information was to read (Experiment 1) or attempted to recall the information (Experiments 2–4). Although subjects rated Sans Forgetica as being more difficult to read than Arial, Sans Forgetica led to equivalent memory performance, and sometimes even impaired it. These findings suggest that although Sans Forgetica promotes a feeling of disfluency, it does not create a desirable difficulty or benefit memory.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Type and type-founding , Cognitive psychology, Educational psychology , Learning, Psychology of , Memory
Journal or Publication Title: Memory
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0965-8211
Official Date: 4 May 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
4 May 2020Available
15 April 2020Accepted
Date of first compliant deposit: 11 May 2020
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Publisher Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 04 May 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us