Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A qualitative study exploring the experience of viewing three‐dimensional medical images during an orthopaedic outpatient consultation from the perspective of patients, health care professionals, and lay representatives

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Phelps, E. E., Wellings, R. M. (Richard M.), Kunar, Melina A., Hutchinson, Charles E. and Griffiths, Frances (2021) A qualitative study exploring the experience of viewing three‐dimensional medical images during an orthopaedic outpatient consultation from the perspective of patients, health care professionals, and lay representatives. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27 (2). pp. 333-343. doi:10.1111/jep.13417 ISSN 1356-1294.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-A-qualitative-study-exploring-experience-threedimensional-orthopaedic-outpatient-Kunar-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1214Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP-qualitative-study-exploring-experience-medical-images-orthopaedic-outpatient-consultation-perspective-patients-healthcare-professionals-lay.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (593Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13417

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives
Three‐dimensional (3D) medical images are shown to patients during clinical consultations about certain health conditions. However, little is known about patients' experience of viewing them. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the impact of sharing 3D medical images with patients during a clinical consultation about hip surgery, from the perspective of patients, health care professionals, and lay representatives.

Method
Interviews were conducted with 14 patients who were shown their own 3D medical images during their clinical consultation and four health care professionals conducting consultations within one orthopaedic outpatient clinic. In addition to interviews, 31 lay representatives participated in six focus groups. The focus groups aimed to gain a broader understanding of the advantages and concerns of showing patients their medical images and to compare 3D and two‐dimensional (2D) medical images. Interviews and focus groups were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results
Three themes were developed from the data: (a) the truthful image, (b) the empowering image, and (c) the unhelpful image. Focus group participants' preference for 3D or 2D images varied between conditions and groups, suggesting that the experience of viewing images may differ between individuals and conditions.

Conclusions
When shown to patients during an orthopaedic clinical consultation, 3D medical images may be an empowering resource. However, in this study, patients and focus group participants perceived medical images as factual and believed they could provide evidence of a diagnoses. This perception could result in overreliance in imaging tests or disregard for other forms of information.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Psychology
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Medical care -- Research, Patient participation -- Research, Hospital patients -- Great Britain -- Attitudes
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1356-1294
Official Date: April 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2021Published
2 June 2020Available
6 May 2020Accepted
Volume: 27
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 333-343
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13417
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions."
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 19 May 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 7 August 2020
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trusthttp://viaf.org/viaf/152707181
ES/J500203/1 [ESRC] Economic and Social Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us