Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Auctions in which losers set the price

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Mezzetti, Claudio and Tsetlin, Ilia, 1970- (2008) Auctions in which losers set the price. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Mezzetti_twerp_845.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (164Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

We study auctions of a single asset among symmetric bidders with affiliated values. We show that the second-price auction minimizes revenue among all efficient auction mechanisms in which only the winner pays, and the price only depends on the losers' bids. In particular, we show that the k-th price auction generates higher revenue than the second-price auction, for all k > 2. If rationing is allowed, with shares of the asset rationed among the t highest bidders, then the (t + 1)-st price auction yields the lowest revenue among all auctions with rationing in which only the winners pay and the unit price only depends on the losers' bids. Finally, we compute bidding functions and revenue of the k-th price auction, with and without rationing, for an illustrative example much used in the experimental literature to study first-price, second-price and English auctions.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Auctions -- Mathematical models, Information asymmetry, Game theory, Mathematical models, Econometric models
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 29 February 2008
Number: No.845
Number of Pages: 20
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Insead
References: Bergemann, D., Morris, S., 2005. Robust Mechanism Design. Econometrica 73, 1771-1813. Bulow, J., Klemperer, P., 2002. Prices and the Winner's Curse. Rand Journal of Economics, 33 (1), 1-21. Harstad, R., Bordley, R., 1996. Lottery Quali�cation Auctions. In Baye, M., (Ed.), Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 6, JAI Press, 157-183. Kagel, J.H., Harstad, R., Levin, D., 1987. Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study. Econometrica 55, 1275-1304. Kagel, J.H., Levin, D., 1993. Independent Private Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior in First-, Second- and Third-Price Auctions with Varying Numbers of Bidders. Economic Journal 103, 868-879. Kagel, J.H., Levin, D., 2002. Common Value Auctions and the Winner's Curse. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Klemperer, P., 2004. Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Krishna, V., 2002. Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego. Krishna, V., Morgan, J., 1997. An Analysis of theWar of Attrition and the All-Pay Auction. Journal of Economic Theory 72, 343-362. Lopomo, G., 2000. Optimality and Robustness of the English Auction. Games and Economic Behavior 36, 219-240. Milgrom,P., 1981. Rational Expectations, Information Acquisition, and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica 49, 921-943. Milgrom, P., 1987. Auction Theory. In Bewley, T. (Ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Milgrom, P.,Weber R., 1982. A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica 50, 1089-1122. Myerson, R., 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58-73. Parlour, C.A., Rajan, U., 2005. Rationing IPO's. Review of Finance 9 (1), 33-63. Parlour, C.A., Prasnikar, V., Rajan, U., 2007. Compensating for the Winner's Curse: Experimental Evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, in press, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2006.10.005. Rothkopf, M.H., 2007. Thirteen Reasons Why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Process Is Not Practical. Operations Research 55 (2), 191-197. Wolfstetter, E., 2001. Third- and Higher-Price Auctions. In Berninghaus, S., Braulke. M., (Eds), Beiträge zur Mikro- und Makroökonomik. Festschrift f. Hans Jürgen Ramser, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 495-503.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1370

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us