Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Oswald, Andrew J. (2008) On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Oswald_twerp_839.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (85Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

I suggest the idea of a reporting function, r(.), from reality to feelings. The ‘happiness’ literature claims we have demonstrated diminishing marginal utility of income. I show not, and that knowing r(.)’s curvature is crucial. A quasi-experiment on heights is studied.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Welfare economics, Home economics -- Accounting, Marginal utility, Happiness
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 8 February 2008
Number: No.839
Number of Pages: 14
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Birnbaum, M. H., 1994, Psychophysics, in: V. S. Ramachandran ed. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Academic Press, London), 3 , 641-650. Diener, E., 2008, Myths in the science of happiness, and directions for future research, in: Eid, M. and R.J. Larsen, The Science of Subjective Well-being (Guildford Press, USA). Diener, E., E. M. Suh, R.E. Lucas, and H.E. Smith, 1999, Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress, Psychological Bulletin 125, 276-302. Diener, E. and M.E.P. Seligman, 2004, Beyond money: Toward an economy of wellbeing, Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Supplement to Psychological Science 5, July, 1-31. Di Tella R, Haisken J, and R.J. Macculloch, 2005, Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel, working paper, Harvard Business School. Easterlin, R.A., 1995, Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, 35-47. Easterlin, R.A., 2005, Diminishing marginal utility of income? Caveat emptor, Social Indicators Research 70, 243-255. Frey, B.S. and A. Stutzer, 2002, Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-being (Princeton University Press, Princeton). Graham, C. and S. Pettinato, 2001, Happiness and Hardship: Opportunity and Insecurity in New Market Economies (Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC). Horowitz, J., J. List, and K.E. McConnell, 2007, A test of diminishing value, Economica 74, 650–663. Krueger, A.B. and D.A. Schkade, 2007, The reliability of subjective well-being measures, University of California, San Diego CEPS Working Paper # 138. Layard, R., 2005, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (Penguin, London). Layard, R., G. Mayraz, and S. Nickell, 2007, The marginal utility of income, working paper, London School of Economics. Mantzavinis, G.D., T.A. Trikalinos, I.D.K. Dimoliatis, and J.P.A. Ioannidis, 2006, Self reported health in high and very high incomes, Quality of Life Research 15, 547-558. Nicoletti, G. and F.L. Pryor, 2006, Subjective and objective measures of governmental regulations in OECD nations, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 59, 433-449. Oswald, A.J., 1997, Happiness and economic performance, Economic Journal 107, 1815-1831. Oswald, A.J., 2005, On the common claim that happiness equations demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of income, working paper, University of Warwick. Oswald, A.J. and N. Powdthavee, 2008, Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges, Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming. Powdthavee, N., 2005, Unhappiness and crime: Evidence from South Africa, Economica 72, 531-547. Sirgy, M.J., A.C. Michalos, A.L. Ferriss, R.A. Easterlin, D. Patrick, and W. Pavot, 2006, The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research 76, 343-466. Stevens, S. S., 1957, On the psychophysical law, Psychological Review 64(3), 153 181. Van Praag, B. and A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2004, Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach (Oxford University Press, Oxford). Winkelmann L. and R. Winkelmann, 1998, Why are the unemployed so unhappy?, Economica 65, 1-15.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1376

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us