Greaves, Justin. (2009) Biopesticides, regulatory innovation and the regulatory state. Public Policy and Administration, Vol.24 (No.3). pp. 245-264. ISSN 0952-0767

Preview

PDF WRAP_Greaves_0381539-pais-250809-regulatory_innovation_paper_final.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (139Kb)

Abstract

This article analyses regulatory innovation. It considers, in particular, how a regulatory environmental agency has been encouraged to innovate in the area of biopesticides. The literature on regulatory innovation is reviewed, the discussion situated within Moran's theory of the regulatory state. It considers to what extent innovation has occurred within the agency, looking at its proactive stance, and how unusually for a regulatory body it has negotiated new policy spaces in which to operate. The article looks at the contextual drivers and also the exogenous and endogenous pressures behind the innovation. It shows how the executive has intervened in order to promote more use of biopesticides and how pressure is also being exerted within the regulatory authority. By using the existing literature and empirical evidence a framework is outlined for explaining the likelihood of regulatory innovation occurring in regulatory agencies.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General) K Law > KD England and Wales
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Great Britain. Health and Safety Executive. Biocides & Pesticides Assessment Unit, Biological pest control agents -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain, Administrative agencies -- Great Britain, Environmental policy -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title:	Public Policy and Administration
Publisher:	Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN:	0952-0767
Date:	July 2009
Volume:	Vol.24
Number:	No.3
Page Range:	pp. 245-264
Identification Number:	10.1177/0952076709103810
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	# Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) (2004 ) Final Report of the Sub-group of the Advisory Committee on Pesticides on: Alternatives to Conventional Pest Control Techniques in the UK: A Scoping Study of the Potential for their Wider Use. York: Advisory Committee on Pesticides. # Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) (2005 ) Crop Spraying and the Health of Residents and Bystanders: a Commentary on the Report. Published by the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution in September 2005, URL (consulted October 2007) http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/acp_home.asp # Black, J. (2005a) `What is Regulatory Innovation', in J. Black, M. Lodge and M. Thatcher (eds) Regulatory Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. # Black, J. (2005b) `Tomorrow's World: Frameworks for Understanding Regulatory Innovation', in J. Black, M. Lodge and M. Thatcher (eds) Regulatory Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. # Black, J., and Lodge, M. (2005) `Conclusions', in J. Black, M. Lodge and M. Thatcher (eds) Regulatory Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. # Boli, J. and Thomas, G.M. (1997) `World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-governmental Organization', American Sociological Review, 62(2): pp. 171-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science]Find it @ CU # Business Regulation Team (2003) Regulatory Impact Unit: 2003 Report. London: Cabinet Office. # Cabinet Office (2003) Innovation in the Public Sector. London: HMSO. # Copping, L.G. and Menn, J.J. (2000) `Biopesticides: A Review of their Action, Applications and Efficacy', Pest Management Science, 56(8): pp. 651-76. # Daugbjerg, C. (1998) `Similar Problems, Different Policies: Policy Networks and Environmental Policy', in D. Marsh (eds) Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press. # Dent, D. (2000) Insect Pest Management. Wallingford: CABI Publishing. # Downs, A. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company. # Ehlers, R. (2007) `Perspectives for Safer Plant Protection', presented at the REBECA Conference: Balanced Regulation for Biological Plant Protection Products, Brussels, 20-1 September, URL (consulted February 2008) http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads/Brussels%20conference/Brussels%20Ralf-Udo%20Ehlers.pdf # European Commission (2001) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council: Evaluation of the Active Substances of Plant Protection Products. Brussels: COM(2001) 444 final. # Flyvjerg, B. (2006) `Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research', Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): pp. 219-45. # Grant, W. (2005) `The Challenges of Interdisciplinary Environmental Research: The Case of Biopesticides', paper presented at the Northeastern Political Science Association Conference, Philadelphia, November. # Hajek, N. (2004) Natural Enemies: An Introduction to Biological Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. # Hall, P.A. (1993) `Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain', Comparative Politics, 25(3): pp. 275-96. # Hampton, P. (2005) Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement. London: HMT. # Hokkanen, H. and Menzler-Hokkanen, I. (2007) `Trade off Effects of Current Regulatory Practice', paper presented at the REBECA Conference: Balanced Regulation for Biological Plant Protection Products, Brussels, 20-21 September, URL (consulted February 2008) http://www.rebeca-net.de/downloads/Brussels%20conference/Brussels%20Heikki%20Hokkanen.pdf # Hood, C., Rothstein, H. and Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulatory Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. # Humphrys, J. (2001) The Great Food Gamble. London: Hodder and Stoughton. # Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown. # Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. # Mahler, A. and Rogers, E.M. (1999) `The Diffusion of Interactive Communications and the Critical Mass: The Adoption of Telecommunications Strategy by German Banks', Telecommunications Polity, 23(10): pp. 719-40. # March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984) `The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life', American Political Science Review, 78(3): pp. 734-49. # Merton, R.K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press. # Moran, M. (2000) `From Command State to Regulatory State', Public Policy and Administration, 15(4): pp. 1-13. # Moran, M. (2002) `Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State', British Journal of Political Science, 32(2): pp. 391-413.[Web of Science]Find it @ CU # Moran, M. (2003) The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. # Moran, M. (2005) Politics and Governance in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. # Pendlington, D. and Dickinson, S. (2003) `New Support for Biopesticides in the UK', Pesticides News, 61(Sept.): pp. 22-3. # Pesticides Safety Directorate (PSD) (2004) Pesticides Safety Directorate Annual Report and Accounts 2003/04. London: The Stationary Office, URL (consulted October 2007) http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/Web_Assets/PSD/PSD_Annual_Report_2003-4.pdf # Pesticides Safety Directorate (PSD) (2007) Pesticides Safety Directorate Annual Report and Accounts 2006/07. London: The Stationary Office, URL (consulted February 2008) http://www.pesticides.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/Web_Assets/PSD/ARA%202006-07.pdf # Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. New York: Free Press. # Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) (2005) Crop Spraying and the Health of Residents and Bystanders. London: RCEP. # Sparrow, M.K. (2000) The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems and Managing Compliance. Washington, DC: Brookings Press. # Stringer, J. and Richardson, J. (1982) `Policy Stability and Policy Change: Industrial Training 1964/82', Public Administration Bulletin, 39: pp. 22-39. # Waage, J.K. (1997) `Biopesticides at the Crossroads: IPM Products or Chemical Clones?', in H.F. Evans (ed.) 1997 BCPC Symposium Proceedings No.68: Microbial Insecticides: Novelty or Necessity? Bracknell: BCPC Publications. # Yin, R.K. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: SAGE.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1386

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item