The Library
Caught in an authoritarian trap of its qwn making? Brazil’s Lava Jato anti-corruption investigation and the politics of prosecutorial overreach
Tools
Tools
Tools
Meszaros, George (2020) Caught in an authoritarian trap of its qwn making? Brazil’s Lava Jato anti-corruption investigation and the politics of prosecutorial overreach. Journal of Law and Society . doi:10.1111/jols.12245 (In Press)
|
PDF
WRAP-Caught-authoritarian-trap-Brazil-anti-corruption-investigation-Meszaros-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0. Download (122Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-Caught-authoritarian-trap-Brazil-anti-corruption-investigation-Meszaros-2020.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1029Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12245
Abstract
The negative and corrosive impacts of corruption in the fields of economics, politics, and law are widely discussed. Less understood are the potentially negative impacts of anti‐corruption struggles and strategies themselves. This article presents a case study of Brazil's ‘Car Wash’ (‘Lava Jato’) scandal from a legal and political perspective. Although the subsequent Operation Car Wash investigation was widely regarded as remarkably successful, supposedly buttressing the rule of law through high‐profile prosecutions of leading politicians and businesspersons, the article argues that legal due process, wider constitutional law, and the political process were undermined. While the use of media leaks to strengthen the investigation proved tactically successful, when coupled with new legal instruments it undermined the presumption of innocence and contributed to a climate in which political and legal debates themselves became increasingly subordinated to simplistic polarizing anti‐corruption discourses, thereby undermining an already fragile political and institutional environment.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Law and Society | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0263-323X | ||||||||
| Official Date: | 2020 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 10 July 2020 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1111/jols.12245 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | In Press | ||||||||
| Publisher Statement: | "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions." | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | ||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
