Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Common right and enclosure in eighteenth-century Northamptonshire

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Neeson, J. M. (1977) Common right and enclosure in eighteenth-century Northamptonshire. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Theses_Neeson_1977.pdf - Unspecified Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (20Mb) | Preview
Official URL: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1748661~S15

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

All occupiers of open field land, and some occupiers of cottages, enjoyed common right of pasture over the open fields and commonable places of a parish; even those with very small holdings could use common pasture; and in royal forest, fenland parishes, and others with sizeable wastes, landless commoners collected fuel wood, furze, browse and much more. Common of pasture was a critical support of the small occupiers' economy. Its value was maintained by a comprehensive communal regulation of the use of the right, and by apparently effective enforcement of field orders. At enclosure common rights were extinguished - although some part of the old economy survived in newly enclosed forest and fen parishes lying near unenclosed common pastures. In many parishes two thirds of all commoners sold some or all of their land, or left their rented holdings; only half as many left their lands in adjacent open field parishes at the same time. Small owners -old their lands in greater numbers than any other group.
Thus opposition to enclosure arose for two reasons: the loss of common right and the loss of land. Opposition in Parliament was voiced in counter-petitions and at the report stage in a majority of successful enclosure Bills. Unlawful opposition in the form of riotous destruction of posts and rails, and more clandestine activity, was more widespread in Northamptonshire than has been thought hitherto; but existing records cannot reveal its full extent. Finally, the enclosure of open fields, and the loss of common rights over waste, woods and permanent commons, closed up the countryside to all but individual owners of land. And for the landless it replaced an economy partially based on rights over all the land with one more dependent on privileges and benevolence.

Item Type: Thesis (PhD)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
K Law [Moys] > KB General and Comparative Law
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Land tenure -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain, Inclosures -- England -- Northamptonshire, Northamptonshire (England) -- Rural conditions
Official Date: November 1977
Dates:
DateEvent
November 1977Submitted
Institution: University of Warwick
Theses Department: Department of Social History
Thesis Type: PhD
Publication Status: Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor: Harrison, Royden
Sponsors: Committee of the Institute of Historical Research
Extent: 458 leaves : illustrations, maps
Language: eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us