The Library
On the efficiency of data collection for multiple Naïve Bayes classifiers
Tools
Tools
Tools
Manino, Edoardo, Tran-Thanh, Long and Jennings, Nicholas R. (2019) On the efficiency of data collection for multiple Naïve Bayes classifiers. Artificial Intelligence, 275 . pp. 356-378. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.010
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-On-effiency-data-collection-multiple-Tran-Thanh-2019.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (1035Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.010
Abstract
Many classification problems are solved by aggregating the output of a group of distinct predictors. In this respect, a popular choice is to assume independence and employ a Naïve Bayes classifier. When we have not just one but multiple classification problems at the same time, the question of how to assign the limited pool of available predictors to the individual classification problems arises. Empirical studies show that the policies we use to perform such assignments have a strong impact on the accuracy of the system. However, to date there is little theoretical understanding of this phenomenon. To help rectify this, in this paper we provide the first theoretical explanation of the accuracy gap between the most popular policies: the non-adaptive uniform allocation, and the adaptive allocation schemes based on uncertainty sampling and information gain maximisation. To do so, we propose a novel representation of the data collection process in terms of random walks. Then, we use this tool to derive new lower and upper bounds on the accuracy of the policies. These bounds reveal that the tradeoff between the number of available predictors and the accuracy has a different exponential rate depending on the policy used. By comparing them, we are able to quantify the advantage that the two adaptive policies have over the non-adaptive one for the first time, and prove that the probability of error of the former decays at more than double the exponential rate of the latter. Furthermore, we show in our analysis that this result holds both in the case where we know the accuracy of each individual predictor, and in the case where we only have access to a noisy estimate of it.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software | ||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Computer Science | ||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Machine learning, Classification, Semantics -- Data processing, Crowdsourcing, Pattern perception | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Artificial Intelligence | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier BV | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0004-3702 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | October 2019 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 27 July 2020 | ||||||||
| Volume: | 275 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 356-378 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.010 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
