The Library
Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion : a drift-diffusion decomposition
Tools
Tools
Tools
Zhao, J. W., Walasek, Lukasz and Bhatia, S. (2020) Psychological mechanisms of loss aversion : a drift-diffusion decomposition. Cognitive Psychology, 123 . 101331. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101331
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-psychological-mechanisms-loss-aversion-drift-diffusion-decomposition-Walasek-2020.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 7 August 2021. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (1508Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101331
Abstract
Decision makers often reject mixed gambles offering equal probabilities of a larger gain and a smaller loss. This important phenomenon, referred to as loss aversion, is typically explained by prospect theory, which proposes that decision makers give losses higher utility weights than gains. In this paper we consider alternative psychological mechanisms capable of explaining loss aversion, such as a fixed utility bias favoring rejection, as well as a bias favoring rejection prior to gamble valuation. We use a drift diffusion model of decision making to conceptually distinguish, formally define, and empirically measure these mechanisms. In two preregistered experiments, we show that the pre-valuation bias provides a very large contribution to model fits, predicts key response time patterns, reflects prior expectations regarding gamble desirability, and can be manipulated independently of the valuation process. Our results indicate that loss aversion is the result of multiple different psychological mechanisms, and that the pre-valuation bias is a fundamental determinant of this well-known behavioral tendency. These results have important implications for how we model behavior in risky choice tasks, and how we interpret its relationship with various psychological, clinical, and neurobiological variables.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science > Psychology | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Cognitive Psychology | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Elsevier | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 0010-0285 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | December 2020 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 4 August 2020 | ||||||||
| Volume: | 123 | ||||||||
| Article Number: | 101331 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101331 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
