Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Household coverage, quality and costs of care provided by community health worker teams and the determining factors : findings from a mixed methods study in South Africa

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Goudge, Jane, de Kadt, Julia, Babalola, Olukemi, Muteba, Michel, Tseng, Yu-Hwei, Malatji, Hlologelo, Rwafa, Teurai, Nxumalo, Nonhlanhla, Levin, Jonathan, Thorogood, Margaret, Daviaud, Emmanuelle, Watkins, Jocelyn and Griffiths, Frances (2020) Household coverage, quality and costs of care provided by community health worker teams and the determining factors : findings from a mixed methods study in South Africa. BMJ Open, 10 (8). e035578. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578 ISSN 2044-6055.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Household-coverage-quality-costs-care-health-worker-Griffiths-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (349Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective: Community health workers (CHWs) are undertaking more complex tasks as part of the move towards universal health coverage in South Africa. CHW programmes can improve access to care for vulnerable communities, but many such programmes struggle with insufficient supervision. In this paper, we assess coverage (proportion of households visited by a CHW in the past year and month), quality of care and costs of the service provided by CHW teams with differing configurations of supervisors, some based in formal clinics and some in community health posts. Participants: CHW, their supervisors, clinic staff, CHW clients. Methods: We used mixed methods (a random household survey, focus group discussions, interviews and observations of the CHW at work) to examine the performance of six CHW teams in vulnerable communities in Sedibeng, South Africa. Results: A CHW had visited 17% of households in the last year, and we estimated they were conducting one to two visits per day. At household registration visits, the CHW asked half of the questions required. Respondents remembered 20%–25% of the health messages that CHW delivered from a visit in the last month, and half of the respondents took the action recommended by the CHW. Training, supervision and motivation of the CHW, and collaboration with other clinic staff, were better with a senior nurse supervisor. We estimated that if CHW carried out four visits a day, coverage would increase to 30%–90% of households, suggesting that some teams need more CHW, as well as better supervision. Conclusion: Household coverage was low, and the service was limited. Support from the local facility was key to providing a quality service, and a senior supervisor facilitated this collaboration. Greater investment in numbers of CHW, supervisors, training and equipment is required for the potential benefits of the programme to be delivered.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Community health services, Community health services -- South Africa, Community health services -- Utilization -- South Africa, Outcome assessment (Medical care) -- South Africa
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN: 2044-6055
Official Date: 20 August 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
20 August 2020Published
3 July 2020Accepted
Volume: 10
Number: 8
Article Number: e035578
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035578
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 2 September 2020
Date of first compliant Open Access: 3 September 2020
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDMedical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
Joint Health Systems Research InitiativeWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010269
UNSPECIFIED[ESRC] Economic and Social Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
UNSPECIFIEDDepartment for International Developmenthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000278
Related URLs:
  • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/...

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us